One of the reasons the equity futures sold off so hard last night is because of the after-hours report that surfaced concerning the Bear Stearns (BSC) hedge funds involved in the subprime mortgage market. The fact that BSC is declaring their hedge funds that are involved in subprime mortgages as worthless or near worthless, has everyone wondering if this subprime problem is really contained or is it going to turn into some kind of contagion that takes down the big banks (and hundreds if not thousands of other funds).
There are two funds that BSC is dealing with at the moment and if they were the only ones then we could certainly say the subprime mortgages and mortgage backed securities (MBS) problems will be easily contained. But is it logical to think that BSC is the only one who owned this kind of hedge fund? I think not.
For a quick recap on the hedge funds in question, BSC had two of them, one more highly leveraged than the other. The more leveraged one is called the High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund (High Grade?) and the slightly less leveraged one is called the High Grade Structured Credit Strategies fund. On June 15th Moody's Investor Service, one of the rating agencies, downgraded some bonds that were backed by speculative subprime mortgages. This affected about $3B worth of bounds, which represents about 1% of the $400B in mortgage-backed bonds that have been issued just since 2006. Some ratings were cut to "junk" from "investment-grade". Ouch, and that requires investors like pension funds to sell them.
Selling these bonds is what forces other owners to change the valuation on their books from "mark-to-[computer] model" to "mark-to-market" and that's where the problems are cropping up. Many investors, BSC being one of them, are finding their valuations are way off the mark and they're lucky to get 10 cents on the dollar for these investments (it's an illiquid market and when there are no buyers of this toxic waste--a Wall Street name for these--the value goes to zero). And this is what has happened to the BSC funds.
The rating agencies have decided to close the barn door after the horses are long gone and somewhere in the north 40. But better late than never and they've started downgrading these MBS to take into account the fact that the foreclosure rate is at historic highs and still climbing. They've been saying they're waiting for proof of a problem before speculating on where the market might go. I guess they got their proof when BSC said their hedge funds went poof!
The bigger question of course is how the ratings agencies (Standard & Poors, Fitch Ratings and Moody's) could have ever imagined repackaging subprime mortgages, which everyone knows are inherently more risky, makes them less risky. By splitting apart the subprime mortgages into separate packages called tranches, saying some magic words over them and sprinkling them with fairy dust, they were magically transformed into AAA-rated bonds, good enough to sell to pension funds who are required by their charters to invest only in investment grade bonds. The trouble is the clock struck midnight and Cinderella's carriage just turned into a massive pumpkin. And it's sitting at the corner of Broad and Wall and starting to rot.
We will show you how you can make $2,000 in cash each month using your existing portfolio equity as collateral. This low-risk strategy works no matter which direction the market goes. Best of all, it is easy to implement and no previous experience with options is necessary.
Take a complimentary 30 day test drive. Click Here:
So the more speculative hedge fund for BSC turned to dust and they've had to notify their investors that, well, sorry, "you know those millions of dollars you gave us? The dog ate them." When this problem came to light in June, BSC said they would inject $3.2B on their own capital to save the funds. Later reports said they had injected about $1.2B and some reports that they decided not to throw any good money after bad and just take their (or their investors') lumps.
BSC started with $638M of investor capital (now gone) and had leveraged it up to a total of $11.15B in long positions. This is 17.5:1 leverage and in the example I gave in last night's Wrap, a 20:1 leverage means the fund's value only needs to drop by 5% and the entire invested capital is wiped out. There are many many hedge funds with similarly leveraged investments in similarly risky junk bonds.
BSC's less leveraged fund had $925M and leveraged it up to $9.682B in long positions, for a much more "conservative" 10.5:1 leverage ratio. So it only took a 10% decline to wipe out investors' money. Merrill Lynch proved that kind of drop the minute they tried to sell off some of BSC's assets to get their $800M back--the best stuff wasn't even getting 90 cents on the dollar. That $800M? It's gone. Oh, my mistake, BSC says that fund is worth 9 cents on the dollar. So thanks for the $800M, here's $72M back. Have a nice day and don't forget to invest with us again!
The SEC has decided to step in now so that they can investigate how this could have happened. Helloo! Where have you been Mr. Cox (SEC Chairman)? What do we pay you for anyway? Post-event analysis? Silly me for thinking the SEC was set up to protect the investor and curtailing things like repackaging garbage, tying a pretty bow on it and calling it investment grade material. A pig in lipstick is still a pig. And I could say the same thing about the SEC (and the Fed), but I won't. Get out of bed with the investment banks and do your job! And with that I'll relinquish my soap box.
These repackaged loans also provided the capital that's been used in all the LBOs (leveraged buy-outs) this year. They're just as stinky and they're just as dangerous to own. The credit derivatives market expanded about 15 times since 2003, in an exponential increase, to about $50T (that's a 'T'). About $7T is in these mortgage-related bonds. Much of this is in the same category as the subprime and LBO funding and therefore much of it will need to be unwound. How quickly it unwinds (not if) will obviously have an impact on our market.
The ABX index, which tracks the performance of various classes of subprime-related bonds, is hitting new lows. The spread between junk bonds and U.S. Treasuries had shrunk to near record lows recently but have made a big jump in the last month. That's understandable. The very low spread was a warning that investors had become entirely too complacent. Now portions of the index that track the safer mortgage bonds, with ratings of AAA and AA, are also falling, down about 5% in the last week. The portion of the index that tracks lower-rated BBB bonds is down more than 50% (and very likely headed much lower as the ratings agencies get busy with their downgrades). So the ramifications of this subprime problem are starting to spread out to other investments.
Contained or Contagion? I hope I've made my opinion clear on the answer to that question. And it's also why I think the Fed engineered last week's Super Thursday rally. The Working Group (PPT) decided to get proactive and knock the shorts out of the market before they could do some real damage. The trouble is their footprint was all over that rally (lack of breadth, negative TICK readings, lack of institutional involvement, etc.) and that is likely to only embolden smart money to really load up short. In fact put options far exceed call options on the S&P 500 and 100. This is usually smart money bets on these indices and they've been very good predictors. Many are saying they expect a 10% correction very soon. I'll say that'll be just the start of it. The PPT will become a bystander very soon, throwing good money after bad.
I've been saying there were clear indications that institutions were not participating in last Super Thursday's rally (lack of program trading being one indication). One reason is the historically low cash levels in mutual funds' coffers. Here's a chart showing cash levels as a percent of assets:
Mutual Fund Cash Levels
As you can see, cash levels are below where they were in 2000 at the previous market peak. We've now had a correction of the 2000-2002 decline and fund managers are so convinced of the strength of the current rally that they've thrown everything they can into this rally (and then some, called margin which is at a record high level). From a contrarian perspective, this raises a big red flag. Obviously that red flag has only made the bull charge even harder but the danger is the sword from the bull fighter (otherwise known as the market). Are you going to be the thrustee (and take the sword) or are you going to parry?
There were a couple of economic reports this morning that did not affect the market. Essentially there were no surprises.
CPI and Core CPI
June Housing Starts and Building Permits
While not an economic report, Bernanke's speech and Q&A session in front of the House Financial Services Committee today provided some entertainment for the market. Congress is criticizing the Fed for the mortgage crisis that's developing, particularly the subprime mortgage mess. Congress needs to look in the mirror and accept much of the responsibility here. In fact there's enough blame to spread around to most of the participants, including those who took mortgages with no intention of making payments on them.
Bernanke assured the Committee that he will tighten consumer protections by writing new mortgage rules. One thing you have to remember about the Fed--their charter is to protect the banking system and not the public. Whatever they do they're doing to protect the banks. The public is obviously served by this endeavor but as far as rewriting mortgage rules, it's for the benefit of the banks and not the little guy. The subprime mess will take a lot of banks and lenders down so that's why the Fed is stepping in.
And now let's take a look at the charts to see what today's pullback accomplished. Obviously there's not much of a change to the daily charts that I showed in last night's Wrap.
DOW chart, Daily
It's possible today's dip is all we'll see for the small 4th wave correction (green wave-iv on the chart) and now we'll get the next leg up to finish the rally. We could see further consolidation with another relatively small decline below today's low or more of a sideways consolidation. Or it might tank straight from here. A drop below 13670 would support the "tanking" scenario.
I show an upside Fib target at 14184 which is where the 5th wave in the rally from March will equal 162% of the 1st wave. The most common Fib relationships between these two waves are 62%, 100% and 162%. Not shown on the chart but assuming the end of wave-iv on the chart finished at today's low then wave-v projects to 14077 for 62% of wave-i and then 14234 for 100%. So those two projections bracket the 14184 projection which I continue to like for an upside target (as long as the market doesn't tank from here).
DOW chart, 60-min
The 60-min chart shows the possibility for another leg down for a slightly larger 4th wave correction. I don't like that interpretation because it would have SPX violating an important support level. Not shown on this chart, but I do show it on the NDX 60-min chart, is a sideways triangle consolidation that takes up the rest of this week. But if we get the next and final rally leg started from here then it's possible we'll see the high for the market get put in by Friday which is a Fibonacci turn date (a Fibonacci 89 days from the March low). Plus or minus one day gives a potential turn window of tomorrow through Monday.
SPX chart, Daily
Overall, SPX is maintaining an ascending wedge look to the final stages of its rally, with the bearish divergences to go with it. It's possible we'll get one more small rally leg up to the 1563 Fib target area which will finish off the entire bull market rally. A slightly more bullish price path would be for price to stair-step higher into early August as it makes its way up towards the 1570 area, maybe even as high as the 1600 area. But if price turns around and heads south again, breaking today's low, then that would make for a strong argument that we've already seen the high. A break below 1506 would confirm that.
SPX chart, 60-min
The downtrend line from June 1st provided support today, as did the previous high on July 9th. Price actually dipped slightly below the June 9th high and by strict definition of the EW rules that's a no-no since a 4th wave pullback can't overlap the 1st wave high. It either means we have a very bullish setup (two sets of 1st and 2nd waves to the upside) or the high could already be in. Since it was a minor overlap and not confirmed by the DOW or NDX, I'm withholding judgment on this overlap. On small time frames I've found the rules need to be subject to interpretation, like any other technical indicator. But a break back below today's low would be a clear violation of the July 9 high and that would negate the bullish wave count, so that's a key level to watch.
My preferred wave count is the bullish one which shows another leg up to finish the entire rally, potentially topping out in the 1560-1570 area. It could stair-step higher into August but that won't become more obvious until the pullback following a new high.
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, Daily
NDX has either topped or it will give us one more new high (with perhaps another few days of consolidation first). Upside potential is as close at 2050 and then up to about 2070, depending on how long it waits to rally again and how much resistance is offered by the tops of its channels. It has to drop below 1970 to give us a heads up that something more bearish is happening, with confirmation by a break below 1948.
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, 60-min
The one-day pullback seems too short in time when I compare to the general size of the rally and the size of the previous 2nd wave correction (not shown on the chart) which was a little more than 5 days. Very often the 4th wave correction takes the same amount of time. That would mean a consolidation that takes us into early next week. I show the possibility for a sideways triangle which is a very common 4th wave pattern.
These triangles are good patterns to trade because there's a high probability that the previous trend (up in this case) will continue so you can play the next leg up. More importantly for where we are in the pattern it also points to the last leg of the move (the 5th wave). You will rarely see a triangle in the 2nd wave position.
So we'll see if this plays out over the next few days and if it does then we're probably looking for a high in NDX sometime towards the end of next week at the earliest.
Russell-2000 (RUT) chart, Daily
The RUT made a big move down this morning, just barely missing the previous low which would have negated the bullish wave count on this chart, and then a big recovery. Like the other indices, this count calls for one more new high. I like the 860 area now for a potential high if it hits it this week. Otherwise a further consolidation would have it on a path similar to what I discussed for NDX.
Russell-2000 (RUT) chart, 60-min
If the RUT immediately turns back down on Thursday and breaks today's low then the bearish wave count will be looking much more likely. Assuming we'll see price either consolidate further or rally to a new high, this rally may chop its way higher into the end of the month or it could be over this week.
BIX banking index, Daily chart
The banks are getting downright volatile lately. Every piece of subprime news is met with either "whew" or "oh sh.." and traders react accordingly. The bullish wave count calls for a rally out of here to new highs. A break above 398 would tell us to look for new highs. The more immediately bearish wave count (dark red) calls for an immediate decline to new lows. In between (light red) we could see another leg up as part of a larger bounce from the July low before it tips back over and heads for new lows. Considering my expectation for another leg up for the broader market I'm thinking we could see another bounce in the banks before it tips back over.
But when I look at Mother Merrill (MER) I get a real bad feeling about the banks, as though the other shoe is about to drop.
Merrill Lynch (MER), Daily chart
I have a slightly different wave count on MER than on the BIX and it could be a significant difference. The wave count on this chart says get ready for a strong 3rd of a 3rd wave down. These usually start with a gap down (see what happened today?) and then run lower from there. If we get a strong breakdown in the banks I'm not so sure the broader market will be able to rally in the face of that. Very definitely worth keeping an eye on Mother here. If she says get out of the shark-infested waters, you'd best listen.
U.S. Home Construction Index chart, DJUSHB, Daily
The light red wave count says we'll get another leg up before tipping back over whereas the dark red count says look lower from here. Common theme is look lower.
Oil chart, August contract (CL07Q), Daily
Oil got a nice lift today on the oil inventory numbers so the rally continues. Short term it's looking a little tired so we should see a pullback/consolidation starting soon. But this should stair-step higher to the $80 area.
Oil Index chart, Daily
Oil stocks got a lift back up with the price of oil taking a jump of more than a dollar. I changed the parallel channel from the chart I posted last night (for those who notice such things). I think this better reflects where support will be, assuming the decline continues, and where a breakdown will tell us the rally from March is finished. It's still in an uptrend and I'm trying to pick a top here, which I think was last Friday's high (Friday the 13th). But that means the oil stocks have to turn right back down tomorrow. No more rally otherwise we haven't seen the highs yet.
Transportation Index chart, TRAN, Daily
Nice stop run this morning! The Trannies gapped up and spiked higher this morning, gave it all back and then recovered about 38% of the drop by the time it closed. That was either an exhaustion gap to finish the rally or else we haven't seen the highs yet. A drop below today's low at 5393 would tell me we've seen the highs.
U.S. Dollar chart, Daily
Still probing for that bottom. We've got hints of MACD turning at its uptrend line that goes back to the beginning of the bullish descending wedge in May 2006. The dollar should come bounding out of here but obviously not until a bottom is found. Even the shorter term charts are saying it's found its bottom (I hate it when it gets lost):
U.S. Dollar chart, 60-min
New lows are being met with bullish divergences on the 60-min chart and that suggests we're about to see a turn back up. The bearish sentiment on the dollar and headlines talking about the demise of the US dollar are enough, from a contrarian standpoint, to say we're ripe for a rally.
Gold chart, August contract (GC), Daily
If the US dollar is close to finding a bottom, is gold close to finding a top in its bounce? I say yes. While much of my opinion on gold has to do with my expectations for the dollar, I'm also biased against gold because I think it will join all asset classes in being sold off as the credit bubble collapses. Inflation fears are not driving the price of gold.
The other reason I'm thinking the current bounce will finish soon (could first get as high as the 62% retracement at 682) is because of the EW pattern. I've highlighted the June 20-27 leg down because I wanted to show its form--it's a 3-wave move. Declines or rallies don't finish with a 3-wave move but instead it indicates it's the middle of a larger move. In this case I'm calling it the middle of an a-b-c bounce off the June 13th low (called an irregular, or expanded, flat correction). I've got wave-1 down to the June 13 low, the current leg up is wave-c of the a-b-c correction for wave-2 and the next move will be a strong decline in wave-3.
If we instead get a pullback followed by new highs (shown in green) then my interpretation is wrong and it will be time to get long gold for what should be a run to new highs (in which case the stock market will also probably still be rallying). But it will have to prove itself to me first. In the meantime I'm looking at the current bounce in gold as an excellent shorting opportunity. Gold should be headed for $500 or lower before the bull market in gold is ready to resume.
Results of today's economic reports and tomorrow's reports include the following:
Unless the LEI (Leading Economic Indicators) come in with a nasty surprise, I don't see tomorrow's reports as being market moving. Sometimes the FOMC minutes can disrupt the market but I don't think the Fed has been saying much that would surprise the market.
SPX chart, Weekly
There's not much to add to last night's commentary on this SPX weekly chart which I used in my top-down analysis of SPX and why I'm looking for a top very soon. I still like the 1563 area for a potential high and depending on how long we consolidate this week, or not, we could see that level hit tomorrow or Friday. The kind of top I'm looking for here is a MOAP (Mother of All Puts) opportunity so look to be testing the next high since it could be a real winner.
The closer we get to August in this rally the closer we complete the same pattern as 1929 and 1987. And the 1929 rally through the summer was all about mergers and buyouts while the economy slowed (sound familiar?). Patterns repeat and it's looking more and more like this one will repeat on us. Get your Tums ready.
Thursday and Friday of opex week have generally been slow trading days as most of the opex squaring is finished. People are waiting for next week to place new bets. This supports the idea that we could consolidate into early next week as I discussed on the NDX 60-min chart. If we do consolidate then it will likely be a choppy mess with no follow through to the moves. But if we see the market break to new highs then I'd be real careful about chasing this one. Instead look for negative divergences as clues to try shorting it.
If you are unable to watch the market during the day then you'll have plenty of time to catch a bounce after an initial decline. I like hunting for tops and bottoms. It's what I do. But many don't like trying to catch turns but instead prefer momentum runs. Momentum to the upside is clearly waning and obviously we have no momentum to the downside so you should be flat and waiting, or have your stops on long positions pulled up closer now.
As always I'll try to catch the tops and bottoms of the moves on the Market
Monitor and show the setups to identify and trade them (had a beautiful setup
that I showed on SPX at this morning's low--a real pretty bottom and we like
pretty bottoms). I'll see you there or back here next week. Good luck in your
Avery Dennison - AVY - cls: 67.74 chg: -0.35 stop: 65.90
We are quickly running out of time with AVY. The company is due to report earnings on the morning of July 24th. That gives us three more trading days. We are not suggesting new positions at this time. More conservative traders may want to tighten their stops toward $67.00. Our target is the $69.75-70.00 range. We do not want to hold over the July 24th earnings report.
Picked on June 11 at $ 66.05
Boeing Co - BA - cls: 101.82 change: -0.23 stop: 99.75 *new*
BA bounced near $101 midday and the afternoon rebound looks like a new entry point to buy calls. However, we are running out of time. BA is due to report earnings on the morning of July 25th. We don't want to hold over the report no matter how good we think it is. That only gives us four more days. We're inching up our stop loss to $99.75, which is under round-number support at $100 and technical support at the 10-dma. Our target is the $109.00-110.00 range.
Picked on July 13 at $101.55
Deere Co - DE - close: 130.70 change: -0.20 stop: 123.55
DE weathered the profit-taking pretty well today. The stock bounced back to close virtually unchanged. We are repeating our previous comments that readers may want to lock in a profit right here. Our first target was the $129.50-130.00 range. We're not suggesting new positions at this time. Our next target is the $134.00-135.00 range.
Picked on June 20 at $123.55
FedEx - FDX - cls: 116.56 change: +0.14 stop: 111.85
FDX is still bouncing sideways. Traders bought the dip again near $115.00. That's the second time this week bulls stepped in to defend the stock near $115. We are aiming for the $119.50-120.00 range. More conservative traders may want to consider a tighter stop loss.
Picked on July 12 at $114.42
GulfMark - GMRK - cls: 54.94 change: +0.31 stop: 53.49
Bulls are still buying the dip in GMRK near $53.75. This is the third time in the last several days so the afternoon rebound might be used as a new bullish entry point. Although our suggestion from yesterday still stands, which is it might be more comfortable to look for a new rise past $55.86 before jumping into new call positions. Our target is the $59.50-60.00 range. We don't want to hold over the late July earnings report. FYI: Don't forget that GMRK expects to change symbols when it moves to the NYSE around July 20th.
Picked on July 09 at $ 55.05
GlobalSantaFe - GSF - cls: 72.06 change: +0.36 stop: 69.90
We don't see any change from our previous comments. Today's bounce erased yesterday's decline. The long-term trend is still up but short-term the technicals look bearish. We would wait for a very clear bounce near the $70.00 level or a new move over the 10-dma (near 73.50) before considering new positions. Our target is the $78.00-80.00 range. We do not want to hold over the early August earnings report. The P&F chart is bullish with an $87 target.
Picked on July 15 at $ 73.05
Helmerich Payne - HP - cls: 35.28 chg: +0.04 stop: 33.95
Traders bought the dip near HP's late June low, which also happened to test technical support at its rising 50-dma. Today's big intraday bounce looks like a new entry point for bullish positions. An alternative entry point would be to wait for a new relative high over $36.60. HP does appear to have long-term resistance near $40.00 so we're setting our target in the $39.85-40.00 range.
Picked on July 15 at $ 36.30
Russell 2000 iShares - IWM - cls: 84.27 chg: -0.30 stop: 81.35
The IWM dipped toward technical support at its 50-dma and bulls bought the dip. The iShares for the Russell 2000 are building on a positive pattern of higher lows. More conservative traders may want to tighten their stops. We're not suggesting new positions at this time. Our target is the $86.50-87.50 range.
Picked on June 24 at $ 82.85
Joy Global - JOYG - cls: 64.14 chg: +1.15 stop: 59.75
Traders bought the dip in JOYG near its rising 10-dma. The rebound turned in an impressive 1.8% gain. Readers could use this as a new entry point for calls but if you do we suggest a tighter stop loss, maybe under $62.00. Our target is the $68.00-70.00 range. The Point & Figure chart is forecasting an $81 target.
Picked on July 11 at $ 62.05
L-3 Comm. - LLL - cls: 100.26 change: -0.26 stop: 97.45
LLL is still consolidating sideways near the $100 level but today's afternoon rebound looks like a potential entry point for new call positions. Our target is the $104.90-105.00 range. We would aim higher but we don't have a lot of time. We plan to exit ahead of the earnings report on July 26th. The P&F chart points to a $113 target.
Picked on July 12 at $100.15
MAGNA Intl. - MGA - close: 95.19 chg: -0.69 stop: 91.89
MGA retested support today. The profit taking continued and shares actually gapped down to open at $94.25 and then dip to $93.37 before rebounding. The big bounce near support in the $93-94 range looks like a new entry point to buy calls again. More conservative traders may want to tighten their stops. Our target is the $99.50-100.00 range. The P&F chart is bullish with a $110 target.
Picked on July 15 at $ 95.40
PACCAR - PCAR - close: 97.59 change: +3.03 stop: 91.95 *new*
PCAR displayed a lot of relative strength today. The stock soared 3.2% and closed at a new all-time higher. Shares are nearing our target in the $99.50-100.00 range. We are raising our stop loss to $91.95. We plan to exit ahead of the July 25th (unconfirmed) earnings report if PCAR doesn't hit our target first.
Picked on July 15 at $ 93.77
Pacific Ethanol - PEIX - cls: 13.64 chg: -0.28 stop: 12.83
Any potential gains in PEIX continue to fade away. It's usually not a good sign when a company's CFO resigns, which PEIX announced today. The stock dropped 2% on the news closed just under what should have been technical support at the 50-dma. Readers may just want to abandon ship. We're not suggesting new positions. We're not suggesting new positions.
Picked on June 24 at $ 12.83
Penn National Gaming - PENN - cls: 59.37 chg: -0.44 stop: n/a
Shares of PENN continue to sink as time runs out on the bid clock. We're nearing the end of PENN's 45-day period to seek additional bidders. If you're willing to gamble on a new offer coming in over the next two weeks we would stick to the August strikes.
Picked on June 17 at $ 62.12
China Petro - SNP - cls: 107.40 change: -3.55 stop: 112.35
Ouch! SNP delivered a very bearish session. Shares gapped lower and broke down under what should have been support at $110 and the rising 50-dma. Fortunately, we're still sitting on the sidelines as spectators. We are going to give SNP one more day. If shares don't bounce tomorrow we'll drop it as a bullish candidate. Currently our trigger to buy calls is at $116.55.
Picked on July xx at $ xx.xx <-- see TRIGGER
Toro Co. - TTC - cls: 61.24 change: -0.62 stop: 57.95
TTC dipped to its rising 10-dma midday. The afternoon bounce looks like a new bullish entry point to buy calls. More conservative traders may want to wait for more signs of a bounce and the same group of traders might want to use a tighter stop loss. Our target is the $64.95-65.00 range. More aggressive traders may want to aim higher. The P&F chart points to a $77 target.
Picked on July 11 at $ 60.75
United States Steel - X - cls: 114.23 chg: +0.70 stop: 109.49
X stamped out a 0.6% gain as bulls bought the dip near $112 this morning. We see the bounce as a new bullish entry point but we've been suggesting that readers wait for a new rise past $115 or a new relative high above $116.40 before initiating new positions. More importantly we're almost out of time. We only have three days left. X is due to report earnings on the morning of July 24th and we don't want to hold over the report. We're not suggesting new positions due to this time factor.
Picked on July 13 at $115.51
XTO Energy - XTO - close: 61.13 change: +1.57 stop: 58.99*new*
Oil and energy stocks were market leaders on Wednesday thanks to new strength and highs in crude oil. XTO rose 2.6% and did so on above average volume. We see today's rebound as a new bullish entry point to buy calls. We are adjusting our stop loss to $58.99. Our short-term target is the $64.85-65.00 range. FYI: We only have four days left! XTO is due to report earnings on July 24th.
Picked on July 15 at $ 60.56
Goldman Sachs - GS - cls: 214.99 chg: -4.41 stop: 224.05*new*
Sub-prime fears are really plaguing the broker-dealers and the group is getting some downgrades. Shares of GS lost 2% and on big volume but investors bought the dip near its June lows. Our target is the 200-dma but since it's been rising we have to adjust our official target zone to the $208.50-207.00 range. We are also adjusting our stop loss to $224.05.
Picked on July 10 at $217.08
(What is a strangle? It's when a trader buys an out-of-the-money (OTM) call and an OTM put on the same stock. The strategy is neutral. You do not care what direction the stock moves as long as the move is big enough to make your investment profitable.)
Advanced Micro - AMD - cls: 15.46 chg: -0.38 stop: n/a
AMD's reaction to Intel's earnings was not as big as we thought it would be. More conservative traders may want to abandon this play and exit early. There is still a chance that AMD's earnings report due out tomorrow (Thursday) will produce some needed volatility. We're not suggesting new positions. The August options we suggested were the the August $16 call (AMD-HQ) and the August $15 put (AMD-TC). Our estimated cost was $1.18. We want to sell if either option hits $1.85 or higher. Aggressive traders could aim for $2.40.
Picked on July 15 at $ 15.43
Intel - INTC - cls: 25.06 change: -1.27 stop: n/a
INTC lost 4.8% on its earnings news. Investors decided to "sell the news" since gross margins came in under expectations. We were expecting a bigger move and more conservative traders may want to exit early. However, we do have August options, which gives us some time. We are no longer suggesting new strangle positions. The August options we suggested were the August $27.50 call (INQ-HY) and the August $25.00 put (INQ-TE). Our estimated cost was $0.96. We want to sell if either option hits $1.65 or higher.
Picked on July 15 at $ 25.97
Manpower - MAN - close: 94.46 chg: -0.59 stop: n/a
MAN continued to trade sideways as investors waited for the company's earnings report due out tomorrow morning. Wall Street's estimates are at $1.20 a share. We are no longer suggesting new strangle positions. We were suggesting the August $100 call (MAN-HT) and the August $90 put (MAN-TR). Our estimated cost was $3.35. We want to sell if either option hits $5.75 or higher.
Picked on July 15 at $ 94.60
MGIC Invest. - MTG - close: 56.00 change: -0.61 stop: n/a
Sub-prime fears sent shares of MTG to an intraday low of $54.69. Shares rebounded to close with a 1% loss. The company reports earnings tomorrow morning. Analysts' estimates are at $1.44 a share. We are not suggesting new positions. We were suggesting the August $60 call (MTG-HL) and the August $55.00 put (MTG-TK). Our estimated cost was $3.10. We want to sell if either option hits $5.95 or higher.
Picked on July 15 at $ 56.98
Burlington Northern - BNI - cls: 92.14 chg: +1.54 stop: 86.99
Target achieved. Railroad stocks continued to out perform with the Dow Jones Railroad index breaking out to new all-time highs. Shares of BNI soared to an intraday high of $94.20. Our target was the $94.00-95.00 range. Volume was very big on BNI's rally today but if you did not exit with us be careful. Shares gave back a large portion of their intraday gains and the move looks like a bearish failed rally pattern.
Picked on July 12 at $ 88.17
The concept of resistance as it's usually defined and understood is meaningless when a stock or index is at a new high, or a new high for a move. Backing up just a bit, prices in any market or financial instrument move in a series of peaks and troughs and the direction of those peaks and lows determine the trend.
Prior troughs, or reaction lows, are usually thought of as support; i.e., a level or area on a price chart under the (current) market price where buying interest is sufficiently strong to overcome selling pressure. The result is a decline is halted and prices turn back up again.
Conversely, resistance is usually identified as a prior peak and represents a price level or area OVER the market where selling pressure overcomes buying and a price advance is turned back.
Case in point is how the prior high at 856 in the Russell 2000 Index (RUT) acted as resistance recently and marked the exact recent high; a sharp downside correction followed although today's rebound from it's intraday low was equally strong.
Well, boys and girls, ladies and gentlemen, how in the heck can you measure or guess at 'resistance' when you keep going to record highs as in the New York Composite Index (NYA), the Dow 30 (INDU) and lately the S&P 500 (SPX)? This is pretty much the same as saying how do you measure a next upside OBJECTIVE for a stock or an index at a new high. Given a prior all-time weekly closing high in SPX at 1527 (March of 2000) when SPX was at 1427, it was easy to figure that the Index had the potential for a 100 point move up to 1527, which was assumed to be RESISTANCE.
In trading, a way to measure objectives is all-important, because you can't
begin to define RISK on a trade, unless you have some way of at least estimating
an objective. You can't estimate your risk to reward potential and keep it a
reasonable 1:3 or 1:4 ratio (or better) unless you can estimate an upside or
downside price target. Those of you who think that it's all a crap shoot anyway
and you can't really estimate such things, probably look at trading as akin to
gambling and probably
do as well in trading, in fact, as you would do in Las
Last week (Wed 7/11 Trader's Corner) I wrote about RECTANGLE chart patterns, where there is a pause in a dominant up or down trend and prices go sideways for some time in a trading range, hitting tops in the same area 2-3 or more times and bottoms in the same area 2-3 or more times. A break out to the upside (above resistance) or the downside (below support) suggests a strong likelihood for a continuation of that move. A rule of thumb for a 'minimum' upside or downside breakout objective is to measure the point distance between the multiple highs and lows of a trading range and add or subtract that distance from the top or bottom end of that price range.
An example of an upside breakout above the top end of such a trading range or
rectangle pattern is seen in the S&P 100 (OEX) daily chart below:
The foregoing does not imply that such a minimum objective for OEX once it pierces the upper end of the trading range or rectangle pattern is a next resistance area for the Index. Rather than a projected resistance, the estimate for a next upswing is just a possible minimum upside objective.
There is a way to also project a price area that might act as a next area of resistance even though prices are in new high ground, either on an all-time basis or at a new high for a move where the old high is well above current levels.
A up trendline is simply a line that connects two or more lows in a rising trend; a line connecting 3 or more lows is considered to be optimal in showing an area of support. This is another way of measuring support. A down trendline is a line connecting 2-3 or more highs in a falling trend. An 'internal' up or down trendline connects the MOST number of highs or lows, so may bisect or cut through one or more bars on a chart.
An uptrend channel is constructed simply by constructing a PARALLEL line to an
up trendline that touches ONE or more tops that date from the
Oil stocks, as measured by the CBOE Oil Index (OIX) on a weekly chart basis, have been in a well-defined uptrend since late-2003. A nearly equally well-defined internal up trendline drawn parallel to OIX's up trendline has marked resistance multiple times, until the recent accelerated surge above the upper trend channel boundary.
You can see that nearly all the spikes above the upper channel line in the OIX weekly chart below that came before early-June were NOT on a weekly closing basis. However, this latest 6-week old spurt higher has ALL weekly closes above the now-pierced upper trend channel boundary. At some point, when prices stop advancing, a new upper trend channel line may be constructed. This channel will be much broader than before and project future highs that could be well above current levels. I always thought that crude oil projected to $100 a barrel.
Looking at the S&P 500 (SPX) weekly chart shows the best recent example of one of our key stock indexes making a move to a new all-time high. Not on an inflation-adjusted basis, where it's above 17 percent under the old high, but that's another story.
The old closing weekly high in SPX has now been well exceeded. However, the upper boundary of the weekly uptrend channel would suggest that resistance may come next in the near-term if SPX approaches a weekly close of 1570. The 1600 area might be reached but the Index have trouble closing above 1570 for the week, again in the relatively near term. Trendlines rise over time, especially steep ones like seen below, so we have to define the time frame of when we are projecting a price intersection to one of these trendlines.
The Dow's weekly chart uptrend channel seen below, which is a High-Low-Close (HLC) chart (not a line or close-only chart as with SPX above), is suggesting that resistance may be hit in next week or two if INDU gets to the 14,100 area. This is a little more precise of a targeted resistance, which is true of HLC chart trendlines in general.
Focusing on weekly AND daily charts in cases where there are a well-defined uptrend channels, we've seen recent highs seemingly meet resistance at their upper trend channel boundaries in some of the major indexes. Whether selling pressures here are temporary or not remains to be seen. I don't start buying puts on such patterns or the like, but it does make me pay close attention to the POSSIBILITY that an index may be topping, especially when a market is showing overbought indications on the Relative Strength Index indicator; or, is showing a bearish price/RSI divergence like seen below.
I am mostly going to put the most attention to what happens to the lead indexes like the S&P 500 and Dow on a weekly chart basis. Besides, we 'all' know the market will (tend to) top in September or October! Maybe when oil hits $90 a barrel. 'What me worry', might take a hit when we got $4.00 a gallon gas and heating costs could go through the roof.
The S&P 100 (OEX) Weekly chart uptrend channel would suggest that this week's high is right at some resistance or where some selling pressure might come in. There has been a tendency in recent months for the OEX to back off a bit from this weekly upper resistance trendline but then rebound to the upper end of its channel again. Stay tuned on this!
In the Nasdaq, both the Composite (COMP) and in the Nas 100 (NDX) Index, recent highs were at or near the upper boundaries of their Daily chart uptrend channel lines. These upper trendlines suggest potential resistance. What we don't know yet is whether this leads to a temporary sell off, and note how strongly COMP rebounded today from its intraday low, or will mark a more significant top over time. Even if temporary, it can be very useful information to have known yesterday that the high was at or very close to some resistance. At least today's downside reaction wouldn't be a complete surprise. I hate surprises unless it's a present!
The Nasdaq 100 (NDX) has the same or similar pattern to what is seen in the Composite chart above. It wasnt surprising to me yesterday that the Composite started falling off from its high and then followed through in a decline today. NDX is holding up quite well however, as the Index has barely backed off from the top end of its channel and may be poised to break out above it. Stay tuned on that!
** E-MAIL QUESTIONS/COMMENTS **
GOOD TRADING SUCCESS!
Today's Newsletter Notes: Market Wrap by Keene H. Little, Trader's Corner by
Leigh Stevens, and all other plays and content by the Option Investor staff.
Option Investor Inc is neither a registered Investment Advisor nor a Broker/Dealer. Readers are advised that all information is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor is it to be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security. All opinions, analyses and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable and written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. In addition, we do not necessarily update such opinions, analysis or information. Owners, employees and writers may have long or short positions in the securities that are discussed.
Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial advisors with respect to any investment. All information contained in this report and website should be independently verified.
To ensure you continue to receive email from Option Investor please add "firstname.lastname@example.org"
Option Investor Inc