Did volatility ever really die down? Actually it did when you look at the VIX over the past six weeks. After spiking above 37 at the August low the VIX returned to its 200-dma and uptrend line from last February's low:
Volatility index (VIX) chart, Daily
I had mentioned last week that I liked the setup for a bearish play in equities if VIX came down and tagged its 200-dma/uptrend line in the 15-16 area with SPX tagging its 1563-1565 resistance level. That short trade has worked pretty well from there. The VIX bottomed on October 11th, coinciding with the market high on that day, did a perfect tap of its 200-dma and then shot higher in the past week. Now it's a question whether the VIX will drop lower (and the market rally higher) or if instead we've seen the market high. As always I'll show both scenarios in the charts.
The market is still trying to figure out whether or not the problems that caused the summer swoon have been fixed or just swept under the rug for now. The credit contraction has in many respects not been fixed but it's certainly been alleviated. Everyone's looking around for evidence the credit monster is going to come back out of the woods for another surprise attack.
The Treasury Department made news over the weekend by announcing the formation of a group of large banks (Citigroup, JP Morgan and Bank of America) that will figure out how to support the credit market in the event of another credit crisis. They are going to create a conduit for the purchase of assets from structured investment vehicles (SIV) that can't find a ready market. The entity that they will create to do this will have the name "M-LEC" for Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit. Great name. Maybe a better one would be MOD for Master of Disguise. Appropriate for Halloween. Think of it as financial engineering squared for the derivatives squared (the SIVs). I will cover this development in more detail this weekend since I'll be filling in for Jim. It's really a fascinating development.
We will show you how you can make $2,000 in cash each month using your existing portfolio equity as collateral. This low-risk strategy works no matter which direction the market goes. Best of all, it is easy to implement and no previous experience with options is necessary.
Take a complimentary 30 day test drive. Click Here:
One of the arguments being tossed around about all of this is whether or not the government should even be getting involved in bailing out those who took on too much risk without appropriate protection. The name given for this is Moral Hazard. If we protect those who took too great risk and penalize those who invested properly (such as penalizing bank shareholders if the banks are forced to buy bad loans that they then have to write off) then one could argue the morality of that.
But if the government doesn't get involved in supporting the financial system then the consequences of a credit collapse could be monumental. It's not an easy problem to solve now and certainly would have been a lot easier to put controls in place instead of calling the creation of this mess a great example of financial engineering as Greenspan did back in 2004-2005. Now he says he didn't see this coming. I have a relatively low opinion of Greenspan but I don't think he's that ignorant of the risks. But maybe I'm wrong.
Back to the moral hazard question, cartoon comics have an amazing way of nailing an issue on the head with just one picture. I saw this one today:
Moral Hazard cartoon, courtesy The Miami Herald
The message is obvious--if I make bad bets then I should be the one who suffers and pay the consequences. We teach our children this very important lesson early on (its called punishment). The cry babies on Wall Street (or wherever they trade these days) are spoiled children and quite frankly need to be punished, Jim Cramer included. But I understand the larger issue of stability in our financial system and it's not an easy problem to solve. I happen to believe the market will solve and it will either be solved quickly or dragged out a lot longer than it should (Japan is a prime example of dragging it out a lot longer due to government involvement and poor decision making).
As for today's activities, we had a relatively busy morning with economic reports and a very bullish opening was quickly turned around and the market sold off for the rest of the day. A late-day rally (surprised by that?) pulled the market back up to essentially even.
CPI and Core CPI
Housing Starts and Permits
Fed's Beige Book
The market has been bouncing around quite a bit the past two weeks and the DOW is back to where it was in mid September. We don't have any clear signals yet on where the market is going next but let's see what the setups look like and where the key levels are.
DOW chart, Daily
The DOW dropped down to just above the mid line of its parallel up-channel from 2006 and then closed just below its uptrend line from August 16th. I'm showing the parallel up-channel for price action since August so the bulls are still alive here. It's entirely possible the bulls will drive this back up towards the top of its longer term channel. If it does so by the end of the month we could see 14500. That would be another 4% rally from here. No matter how bearish you feel about this market, or why it shouldn't be able to do that, keep reminding yourself that the market is not logical, it just is.
A rally back above 14011, this morning's early high, would be bullish. It would violate the bearish EW (Elliott Wave) count on the chart and it would be a confirmed break of its downtrend line from last week's high.
DOW chart, 60-min
The downtrend line from last week is the top of a descending wedge as depicted on the chart. Today's low did a throw-under below the bottom of it and then rallied back up into the pattern. That's buy signal #1. A rally out the top of the pattern, so above 13950, would be buy signal #2. And then a pullback to the broken downtrend line for a successful retest (the pullback only occurs about 50% of the time) would be buy signal #3. That's the bullish setup.
What I'd like to see, but don't, is bullish divergence at the new lows. A bullish descending wedge should show clear bullish divergence. So that's a heads up that we might not have a descending wedge pattern here--we saw lots of failures of rising wedges in the past year as the market rallied out the top of them. Be careful of the possibility for the opposite to happen on the downside.
I'm expecting a pullback early in the morning since it looked like the bounce off today's low completed a 5-wave move. Therefore we should see a correction of that move and then another leg up. Once that larger 3-wave bounce is completed, especially if it's at the downtrend line, then we'll have a potential bearish setup. It would be an especially good setup if price fails at its broken uptrend line from August 16th where it crosses the downtrend line near 13930 (depicted in pink). That's the bearish setup.
So now we let price lead the way and trade accordingly. I don't think price will immediately fail from here and drop to a new low first thing tomorrow but I wouldn't be surprised by anything this market does, especially during opex week.
SPX chart, Daily
I attached a line to the September 10th low that is parallel to the one along the highs of the rally since August. This creates a potential parallel up-channel for the rally and a logical place for a 4th wave correction to find support (green wave-4 on the chart). As long as today's low continues to hold then there is the possibility for another rally leg up to a new high. The Fib projection at 1606.58 crosses the mid line of the parallel up-channel at the end of the month.
For the bears, last week's high could have been it. With SPX struggling at the 1563-1565 Fib area (it rallied above it on Thursday but was not able to close above it) it was a good setup and on Thursday I called for a short play on the Market Monitor. Bears want to see SPX stay below 1550 and continue lower. A break below 1507 is needed to confirm the likelihood that a market high is in.
SPX chart, 60-min
Like the DOW I'm showing a potential bullish descending wedge. You can see the throw-under today and then recovery back inside the pattern. So we have a buy signal on SPX as well as the DOW. We should get a pullback followed by another leg up and that will be an important test for the bulls. It will need to get back above 1550 to negate the bearish wave count on the chart and then the next resistance level would be a retest of its broken uptrend line from August, currently up near 1560.
Also like the DOW, for a bullish interpretation of this pattern I would like to have seen clearer evidence of bullish divergence to confirm this pattern. Without I remain somewhat suspect. Without getting into the details of EW first waves, sometimes they form wedges like the one we see on this chart. Therefore, if today's low was the completion of a first wave down then a failed retest of its broken uptrend line (as an example of where the bounce could get to) could be a good short setup for the third wave down. It's what I'll be watching for on the Market Monitor (the earliest it would probably set up would be Friday or Monday).
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, Daily
The NDX remains the most bullish looking index. It has held onto its uptrend line from August, the only one to do so, and the consolidation pattern since last week's high looks constructive for another rally out of it. I'm leaning bullish on this one and it will be interesting to see if it stalls just above 2200 at the top of its parallel up-channel from 2002. If it leaves a bearish divergence at the new high and is not accompanied by any of the other indexes (making for a bearish non-confirmation between indices) then it will be bearish. But it would require a new high followed by a drop back below 2150 to issue a sell signal.
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, 60-min
The sideways triangle pattern since last week's high looks like a 4th wave continuation pattern and says we should see a rally out of it (depicted in green). Today's low was very possibly the throw-under finish to the pattern (typical). A pullback early tomorrow should set up a buy signal for those who would like to scalp a long. I hesitate to recommend a long on this since the 2200 level may be all we're going to see. Watch it closely if long.
Relative Strength of NDX vs. the Nasdaq, Daily
I showed this chart last week and I'll continue to show it so that we can watch to see if it will be effective in calling an approaching high. As long as the generals are in the lead then that's a good thing. As soon as they start underperforming the rest of the tech stocks we'll know the generals are hanging back and letting the troops out front to get shot. So far so good for the bulls.
Russell-2000 (RUT) chart, Daily
I've been showing the rising wedge for the RUT and calling it bearish. Like the current descending wedges I've shown for the DOW and SPX, what I don't like about the rising wedge is the lack of bearish divergence at the new highs. Therefore the bullish possibility, like the others, is that we'll see another push higher for a likely retest of the July high. The Fib projections for green wave-5 are at 856 and then 881. Otherwise a break below 802 and its uptrend line from August 16th through September 10th would be bearish.
I'm currently reading a technical analysis book and came across the following chart in the book:
Rising Wedge pattern, "Technical Analysis" by Charles Kirkpatrick and Julie
Notice the similarity of the pattern depicted in the book and the one I have drawn on the RUT's daily chart above. After what could be the climax peak in price in July we have what looks like a risking wedge up to a retest of that prior peak. Price has now broken below the wedge and one has to wonder if all we'll get is a pullback to the broken uptrend line and then a continuation lower. In the book the authors make reference to data that shows a pullback to a broken trend line like this happens only a little less than 50% of the time. Therefore a bounce from today's low followed by a new low would be a bearish signal.
Russell-2000 (RUT) chart, 60-min
The RUT looks like the DOW and SPX with the potential descending wedge from last week's high. We've got wedges all over the place and may be yet another indication of a topping process. Tops in markets tend to be a process (e.g., a rolling top) versus an event at bottoms (e.g., a v-bottom). The broken uptrend line from September 10th is currently near 836 so if it manages to rally back up to this trend line keep a close eye on it for failure as an opportunity to short the small caps.
As depicted in dark red, it's possible we'll see the market immediately head lower once the current bounce is finished. As long as the RUT stays below 832 and then drops to a new low the bearish wave count calls for a very strong selloff so don't get caught long if a new low is made from here. In the meantime, hints of bullish divergence suggest we could in fact get another rally leg to a new high so don't be caught short if it rallies above 832 (until you give it a chance to see how it does against its broken uptrend line).
BIX banking index, Daily chart
The banks are ugly. While it's possible we'll see the banks get another rally leg back up within its consolidation (continuation) pattern, I can't put anymore lipstick on this and call it pretty. The current decline from the high on October 5th fits well as a 3rd wave (which should exhibit strong selling (or buying in a rally). Therefore the most I'm expecting out of the banks is a small 4th wave consolidation and then a continuation lower. The banking index is a very loud warning to bulls not to get complacent about their positions. If the banks were going to benefit from anything the government, or anyone else, does for them, they're not showing it. The message from the banks is very clear--be afraid, be very afraid.
The brokers aren't looking any better:
Brokers index (XBD), Daily chart
Another rising wedge, another break down. Again, there wasn't the usual bearish divergence at the last high to it's possible we'll see the broker index push to another high but right now it's looking bearish. A failed retest of the broken uptrend line would be a good short play setup.
And then there's Mother Merrill (MER). It's always a good idea to ask Mother what to do next.
Merrill Lynch (MER), Daily chart
The sideways triangle is a very reliable continuation pattern. In this case price dropped down into it and it's a high-odds play that price will drop out of it. Many of the big investment banks made gobs of money during the heyday of leveraged investments. They used leverage well in excess (and still are leveraged) of what got Long Term Management Capital in trouble in 1998. Is it any wonder the Treasury Dept. is pulling out the stops to get involved here?
These big investment houses are in trouble and this chart is a screaming short. Whether it bounces back up for another test of the top of its pattern or drops from here is the question. Mother says come inside so as not to get caught out in the rain. The dark rain clouds and lightning bolts are getting closer.
U.S. Home Construction Index chart, DJUSHB, Daily
I thought the housing index was going to do it this time--I thought it would break its downtrend line from May. But last week I suggested we could see a pullback to retest its low and I think that's still a possibility here. Then a bounce should break its downtrend line. I shows the potential for a sideways triangle consolidation over to the top of its parallel down-channel. It could bounce up to it instead or it might even drop lower before consolidating. It's not finished going down but it does need to correct its decline from May.
To keep things in perspective, here's the weekly chart of the housing index:
U.S. Home Construction Index chart, DJUSHB, Weekly
Price should work its way down into the end of the year and likely find firmer support around the 2001 or 2002 lows. There's a Fib projection at 215 and for now I think that makes for a good downside target.
Oil chart, December contract (CL07Z), Daily
The November contract (the front month) made a high around $89 today but the December contract hasn't tagged $88 yet. Sounds like traders don't believe the high prices will stick around. The Fib projection for the December contract at 88.15 (where wave-(v) = wave-(i) in the rally from May) makes for a good upside target. It's possible we saw the high today as it came close and today's candlestick is a shooting start. A red candle tomorrow would be a confirmation of the reversal signal. It takes a break below $82 to confirm the high is probably in otherwise we could see oil pull back and then rally to a higher Fib target at $92.
Oil Index chart, Daily
The oil stock index broke its uptrend line from August and has since been pressing up underneath it. While it's bullish that it's making new highs, it's bearish that it's doing so underneath that broken uptrend line. The bearish divergences suggest we're going to see it break down soon.
Transportation Index chart, TRAN, Daily
The Transports is the other index (along with banks, and semiconductor index not confirming the tech rally) not confirming the broader market rally. As you can tell this is not a timing tool but it does suggest caution vs. complacency about being long the market. The Trannies did a throw-over above its consolidation pattern, dropped back inside and has now broken below the pattern. Today's bounce has it back up for a potential retest of its broken uptrend line. If it fails this test and drops back below yesterday's low then we will have had the third sell signal out of this continuation pattern.
U.S. Dollar chart, Weekly
This is the weekly chart to keep the bigger move in perspective. It's possible the US dollar has found a bottom (around its downside Fib projection at 78.28) or else it will drop a little lower to the bottom of a parallel down-channel for price action since September 2006, currently near 77.
Gold chart, December contract (GC07Z), Daily
I called a short on gold yesterday on the Market Monitor when it tagged its Fib target at 771.40 (hit 772 in overnight trading). The throw-over above its rising wedge, accompanied with bearish divergence, tagging its Fib target and then dropping back inside the pattern was a very good setup. I of course have no idea if we've seen the final high but I'll take this kind of setup, on any symbol, every time. You take, you set your stop and you let 'er rip (I had my stop set at 766 tonight which got tagged as I write so I'm watching overnight trade to get back in if it fails at or below its downtrend line from Monday's high, currently at 767.50). Now all I need is a rally in the US dollar to help the play.
Results of today's economic reports and tomorrow's reports include the following:
Tomorrow's economic reports should not move the market. If the Leading Indicators comes in much worse (or better) than expected then it could move the market but not likely. The Philly Fed index at noon could also move it but right now most of the opex positions have probably been squared and it could be just a consolidation day.
SPX chart, Weekly
There's been no change on the weekly chart as we're still waiting for an answer as to whether last week's high was THE high or if we've got one more up to the 1600 area by the end of the month. Hopefully next week we'll know which it is.
Today showed the typical volatility seen during opex week and I suspect tomorrow will be quieter. I think the higher odds scenario is for an early pullback that stays above today's low and then another leg up that creates a larger 3-wave bounce off today's low. Whether that turns into something more bullish, including breaking downtrend lines from last week and getting back above broken uptrend lines, or then rolls back over is the big question for me tonight.
A strong rally back up from here would have a good chance of seeing some new yearly highs for at least one of the indexes (NDX) and then it'll be a matter of watching the others to see if they'll join in. But a 3-wave bounce that stays below the key levels I identified (such as DOW 14011 and SPX 1550) that then rolls over and heads for a new low below today's would be a bearish statement. It could even be accompanied by very strong selling (bordering on panic selling since the bearish wave count would support a very strong decline) so use that as your guide for how you want to be positioned in the market.
We still have the longer term up trends intact and therefore respect the possibility that the bulls have some more work to do. But with the plethora of warnings we're getting for some of the other sectors/indices it would be sensible to stay close to the market right now if you're long. It would be better not to get trapped by a downside surprise that jumps right over your stops so you may want to stay available to exit quickly if the need arises. Let's get through October (we're still in the vulnerable period) and then reassess what we've got then.
But as I showed on the charts, it's possible we put in a low for the pullback and now will start the next rally leg to new highs. I showed some Fib projections and trend lines that intersect at the end of the month. Wouldn't it be interesting if we see the market rally to new highs by October 30th when the Fed meets again for the next rate decision. Now That would be an interesting setup.
Good luck with your trading and I'll be back here for the weekend Wrap.
Play Editor's Note: It has been a rough week for the bulls thus far. The DJIA, S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 have all seen new short-term sell signals produced on their daily charts. The prevailing trend is still up but I'm not convinced it's time to buy the dip yet. Let's see if there is any follow through on today's afternoon bounce!
Cummins Inc. - CMI - cls: 137.94 change: +1.05 stop: 135.85*new*
Shares of CMI did not make much progress on Wednesday. The stock bounced around the $136-140 range. The bad news being that round-number resistance at $140 held again. The good news being that traders bought the dip at $136 yet again. Before you consider new positions consider your time frame. We do not want to hold over the October 25th earnings report. Our target is the $149.50-150.00 range. Please note that we're adjusting our stop loss to $135.85.
Picked on October 11 at $140.85
Diamond Offshore - DO - cls: 115.24 chg: -2.60 stop: 112.45
Crude oil hit another high intraday but this time oil and oil service stocks hit some profit taking. DO lost 2.2% and dipped under what should have been support near $115.00. A bounce from here could be used as a new bullish entry point. DO is due to report earnings on October 25th. If shares don't hit our target we'll plan to exit on October 24th at the closing bell. Our short-term target is the $124.50-125.00 range. One of our biggest concerns is that a correction in crude oil would spark some heavy profit taking in the oil service stocks. FYI: The P&F chart is bullish with a $173 target.
Picked on October 14 at $117.20
(What is a strangle? It's when a trader buys an out-of-the-money (OTM) call and an OTM put on the same stock. The strategy is neutral. You do not care what direction the stock moves as long as the move is big enough to make your investment profitable.)
Dow Jones Industrial Avg. - DJX - cls: 138.93 chg: -0.20 stop: n/a
Tomorrow is our last day of trading in the DJX October options. We will plan to exit at the closing bell. The DJX is a European style option and trading will cease after Thursday even though the option doesn't expire until Saturday. We are not suggesting new positions on the October version of our strangle. The options listed for our October strangle were the October $137 calls (DJY-JG) and the October $132 puts (DJW-VB) with an estimated cost of $4.75. We want to sell if either option hits $6.00.
Picked on September 16 at $134.43
Google Inc. - GOOG - cls: 633.48 chg: +17.48 stop: n/a
GOOG rebounded sharply, possibly due to strong earnings from rival Yahoo (YHOO). Our strategy is unchanged although if you have not yet opened positions you may want to move your strikes prices up a couple of strikes. We don't see any changes from our play description. We're expecting GOOG to see a post-earnings sell-off. The company reports tomorrow (Thursday) after the closing bell. Wall Street expects the Internet titan to earn $3.77 a share. This time we're not suggesting a strangle play. We're going to list an aggressive, directional, and highly-speculative put play. Plus, we're listing a slightly less aggressive but still speculative put-spread play.
Our first strategy was the speculative put play. Our suggested strike was the November $550 put (GOP-WY). Our estimated cost was $7.00. If you haven't opened a position yet you may want to consider the November 570s.
Our second strategy was the speculative put spread. We suggested buying the November $580 put (GOO-WP) and selling the November $530 put (GOP-WW). If you haven't opened positions yet you may want to use the November 600 and November 560 instead.
Picked on October 16 at $616.00
Intl. Bus. Mach. - IBM - cls: 115.78 chg: -3.82 stop: n/a
IBM did not see much of an after hours reaction last night but shares did see a post-earnings reaction today. The stock gapped open lower. Then, when most of the market was bouncing higher this afternoon, shares of IBM saw its sell-off pick up speed! We're not suggesting new positions. Our aggressive October strangle suggested the October $125 call (IBM-JE) and the October $110 put (IBM-VB). These expire at the end of this week. Our estimated cost was $1.20. We wanted to sell if either option hit $2.40. Our November strangle suggested the November $125 call (IBM-KE) and the November $110 put (IBM-WB). Our estimated cost was $3.00. We wanted to sell if either option hits $6.00.
Picked on October 15 at $118.03
NASDAQ 100 trust - QQQQ - cls: 53.56 chg: +0.69 stop: n/a
The NDX rebounded sharply from its intraday lows and looks poised to rally higher. Will it break through resistance near $54? We are not suggesting new positions. This is an aggressive play with October options that expire in three days. The options we suggested in our October strangle were the October $54 calls (QQQ-JB) and the October $53 puts (QQQ-VA). Our estimated cost was $0.76. We want to exit this strangle if either side hits $1.50 or higher.
Picked on October 14 at $ 53.53
Amgen Inc. - AMGN - cls: 56.41 change: -0.37 stop: 55.90
It looks like we should have exited after Monday's bearish reversal. AMGN barely paused at the $56.00 level today, which was where shares appeared to have some short-term support. The stock dove to $55.27 before bouncing back with the NASDAQ's big afternoon rebound. AMGN would have hit our stop at $55.90 around 1:00 p.m. today.
Picked on October 11 at $ 58.01
Stryker - SYK - cls: 72.19 change: -0.08 stop: 70.65
We have run out of time with SYK. It was our plan to exit today at the closing bell to avoid holding over the company's earnings report. The company has reported and EPS numbers were inline with expectations at $0.55 a share. The stock is not seeing much of an after hours reaction.
Picked on October 02 at $ 70.65
I've been wondering lately if there is really a sea shift in market leadership going on with tech stocks, as reflected in the biggest cap Nasdaq (NDX) index and the big cap S&P 100 (OEX)? (There are a few stocks that are in each index of course.) A slight variation of my wondering is whether NDX has broken out to a big new up 'LEG' and if this index is just going to go its own way like the Dow had done sometimes? It got me wondering about the long-term trend of NDX versus OEX. I used to trade spreads a lot, but I had not looked at NDX versus OEX in awhile.
A ratio chart, or the larger index divided by the smaller, is my preferred way to look at the two indexes versus a spread chart that would subtract the smaller index (in terms of numerical value) from the larger.
But first, I'll revisit where each Index is in terms of 1.) the broad uptrend channels each has been in, looking for whether NDX and OEX are at potential resistance (or has broken out, as would be expected in a new up 'leg') and 2.) how 'overbought' each index might be in terms of the 13-week (quarter of year) Relative Strength Index (RSI).
WEEKLY CHART UPTREND CHANNELS
NASDAQ 100 (NDX):
My first weekly line chart below assumes that today's NDX close is also the weekly close. Today's NDX close is just a hair's breadth from resistance that is implied, but not yet 'proven' to lie, in the 2200 area or at the top end of its major uptrend channel; as highlighted below. To suggest that the Nas 100 Index has achieved a decisive upside penetration of technical resistance would take a close this week above 2200. Stay tuned on that!
Again of course, the week is not over and the weekly RSI ('length' setting equal to 13) will go up, down, or stay the same from the level showing in this indicator today. In the time frame shown above there was an exception in mid-2003 to an RSI in the overbought range coinciding with a big decline that followed. There are almost always exceptions to technical models! Otherwise, we could just follow these things and ALWAYS make money, assuming we didn't overtrade. WRONG!
I didn't mention the period apparent in late-2005/early-2006 per the chart above, when the RSI got to its typical overbought zone but prices shot up another time. Not hugely higher, but we're talking options trading here, not being short a stock! However, during that juncture, in a classic price/RSI bearish divergence, RSI failed to confirm that higher high; after that divergence it was a long way down to a major bottom in mid-2006.
WEEKLY CHART UPTREND CHANNELS
S&P 100 (OEX):
I can't say that it's at all a similar situation, but I haven't seen this pattern of rising weekly closing prices, against the pattern of a DECLINING trend in the 13-week RSI; as highlighted by the down trendline on the RSI chart above. Such divergences can go on for a long-time but they usually, and I'd emphasize 'usually', such divergences end with a steep decline at some point. Stay tuned on that!
THE NDX/OEX SPREAD RATIO:
In some ways, this is the most interesting and telling chart. At the market bottom in October of 2002 (specifically, the week ending 10/4/02), with NDX closing at 815 and the OEX at 403, NDX was 2.02 times the (numerical) value of OEX; this is highlighted at the level line on the lower most ratio line of the chart below. Today's ratio was 3.03!
It's clear that NDX has been gaining on OEX for some time on a PRICE basis. Of course, NDX was started in 2002 from a point that was MUCH lower than OEX in terms of its percent decline from the 2000 top. This doesn't concern us in terms of trading the relative indexes in terms of calls to puts on an equal weighted basis. There have been times that being in the appropriate number of NDX calls relative to OEX puts was a winning strategy.
Moreover, it's apparent that there have been support and resistance areas in the NDX/OEX ratio. The 2.51 level was a support floor to NDX/OEX in mid-2004 and 2.99 was a 'resistance' area in late-2005/early-2006. The dip in the ratio back to near 2.51 in August of 2006 took the spread again back to an area of support; i.e., NDX with better upside potential relative to OEX. Buying NDX calls versus OEX puts turned out to be a winner executed in the right proportions.
Buying pullbacks to the up trendline on the ratio chart in May 2007 (long NDX calls versus OEX puts) was not unlike buying a stock or index on a similar pullback to an up trendline.
At this juncture an interesting question is whether the spread between NDX and OEX has gotten about as wide as it's going to get. The relative valuations have now carried a bit above the high of the NDX/OEX ratio seen previously in the multiyear timeframe shown above, but I would look on this as a sort of natural 'resistance' area rather than a breakout.
The probability of NDX soaring a whole lot further relative to OEX wouldn't be my bet of the year, but we'll see won't we. Analysis of the NDX/OEX spread widening is another way of looking at NDX resistance potentially being close at hand. This, irrespective of rebounding moves in EBAY, GOOG, MSFT, INTC, YHOO and, last but not least, in AAPL.
GOOD TRADING SUCCESS!
Today's Newsletter Notes: Market Wrap by Keene H. Little, Trader's Corner by
Leigh Stevens, and all other plays and content by the Option Investor staff.
Option Investor Inc is neither a registered Investment Advisor nor a Broker/Dealer. Readers are advised that all information is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor is it to be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security. All opinions, analyses and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable and written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. In addition, we do not necessarily update such opinions, analysis or information. Owners, employees and writers may have long or short positions in the securities that are discussed.
Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial advisors with respect to any investment. All information contained in this report and website should be independently verified.
To ensure you continue to receive email from Option Investor please add "email@example.com"
Option Investor Inc