Anyone who has stood at the waterline at the beach as the water rushes back and forth over your feet will understand the analogy of standing, or building, on shifting sands. You obviously want to build upon rock instead of sand (although I guess that's not a problem with all the building going on in Dubai, although come to think of it...nah, we won't go there). The rally off the March low has been built on hope--hope that the credit problem will be contained, hope that the Fed really can save the banks, hope that the economy will have experienced only a mild and short-lived recession.
I've been a non-believer in the hope-filled expectations that the stock market will end the year higher than it began. I felt we would get a big rally leg off the March low, gave some upside targets along the way and we achieved them. Since the high in May I've been looking for the market to turn back down. Whether it will only pull back a little and head higher again, or chop sideways in a big consolidation between the January/March lows and May highs, or head to new lows, no one can know for sure. I like to show alternative ideas on my charts, with key price levels, and then let price tell me which scenario is likely playing out.
I happen to believe at the moment that the bounce off the January/March lows is finished and we'll head to new yearly lows next. Now it's a matter of watching price action to see how and when I should change that expectation. While I may have bearish opinions about the economy and credit fiasco, I try hard to let price control my trades and keep my bias out of the way (hard to do). I consider the large problems facing our economy, namely an unwinding of the massive credit increase since the late 1990s, to be a fundamental issue that will have a negative impact on our markets (global markets). But I look for other more technical indicators to either support my opinions or refute them. One "indicator" is consumer sentiment.
I have pointed out in the past how consumer sentiment is closely correlated with the stock market. This makes sense if you believe the stock market swings primarily due to emotional mood swings rather than fundamental reasons. I've often stated that fundamentals follow the emotional swings in the masses. When people get worried, frustrated and angry they reign in their spending and tend to sour towards the stock market and turn bearish. When they're feeling positive and bad things roll off their backs like water off a duck's back then they feel comfortable enough to spend their money and feel good about the stock market and turn bullish.
For a long time we've had consumer sentiment that has been OK but not great, and certainly not as high as it was in the latter part of the 1990s and 2000. I downloaded the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment monthly data from 1986 and matched it up with the monthly closing prices of the DOW Industrials. The following chart shows the result:
Consumer Sentiment vs. DOW Industrials, 1986-2008
The vertical gray bars show when consumer sentiment turned down, specifically in 1990, 2000-2002 and then since the rebound high in 2004 (which was a lower high than 2000). In 1990 the stock market turned down with sentiment (looks like only a small drop due to log scale used for the DOW and its large rally since 1990). The stock market again turned down in 2000 and reversed back up with sentiment in 2003. But since 2004 there's been a real disconnect. While consumer sentiment has been steadily eroding, with a brief bounce in 2006, the stock market kept rallying. Consumer sentiment has nose-dived since early 2007 but the stock market has barely budged to the downside.
I believe this is about to change and it could change in a big way. I think the stock market will follow consumer sentiment and head for new lows. This has been a very consistent relationship until the past few years and I just don't see it staying this divergent for long. This is just one more indicator that has me thinking the stock market will work its way back down at least to the 2002-2003 lows over the next year or two.
But the market does not move in a straight line and while the past week has been negative it does not preclude another rally leg tomorrow as part of a larger declining pattern. I want to review some longer term charts of the DOW before getting into my regular charts. The first chart is a monthly chart since the 1960s, from Elliott Wave International. There's a very interesting long-term uptrend line that they pointed out:
DOW chart, Monthly, courtesy Elliott Wave International
The bear market of the late-1960s/early-1970s arguably ended at the low in 1974. Drawing an uptrend line from that low through the October 2002 (bold green) low shows how many times the DOW used that line for support and resistance (blue circles on the chart). One could argue that this trend line is an important one. The red uptrend line from August 1982 through the October 2002 low shows where the DOW found support on the pullbacks in 2005 and 2006. It's hard to see but the May high also stopped at that red uptrend line (easier to see in the next chart). What's interesting about the green uptrend line is that the DOW found support there in January and March of this year.
These trend lines are shown with a closer view on the following weekly chart:
DOW chart, Weekly
The weekly chart shows the red uptrend line from August 1982 stopped the rally in May (and the initial bounce in January). The green uptrend line from 1974 is where the January and March declines found support. It's also where the 2000 high (12750) is located so it was a doubly important support level. It's not hard to understand why the bulls felt excited about the buying opportunity. After all, we are still in a very long term up trend. Trading with the trend tells us to be looking to buy pullbacks.
We will show you how you can make $2,000 in cash each month using your existing portfolio equity as collateral. This low-risk strategy works no matter which direction the market goes. Best of all, it is easy to implement and no previous experience with options is necessary.
Take a complimentary 30 day test drive. Click Here:
My bearish calls for a stronger decline this year are therefore obviously early. It takes a break of the green uptrend line, currently near 12080, to get Paul Revere racing through the townships yelling "the Bears are coming, the Bears are coming!" As I indicate with the pink price scenario, we could get another bounce off that uptrend line and head back up for a new yearly high. That would obviously be a bullish move even if it's unable to top last year's high. Therefore a drop to the uptrend line (assuming we'll get it) will be carefully analyzed for the possibility I should reverse long.
After the DOW pulled back from the red uptrend line, which is using the Log price scale, I shifted back to the arithmetic scale to show on the daily chart (along with the uptrend line from the March 2003 low):
DOW chart, Daily
On the daily chart the uptrend lines from October 2002 (which is actually the one from August 1982 through the October 2002 low) and March 2003 show how much the DOW has been using them, primarily for support on pullbacks (highlighted in yellow). Today's doji candle is just below both trend lines and therefore the DOW is in danger of breaking down here. But if tomorrow is an up day the candlestick pattern will be a bullish morning star reversal pattern. The bulls need to keep their fingers crossed for a bullish day.
Key Levels for DOW:
DOW chart, 60-min
The downtrend line from October could be a magnet that attracts the DOW for another retest of it before letting go (shown in pink). That would be a run back up to about 12450. Otherwise short against today's high is the right place to be for now.
SPX chart, Daily
SPX is fighting to hold support at its broken downtrend line from October. It has not been able to hold onto its 50-dma just above at 1381. The spike low in August 2007 at 1370 continues to provide support as well. A break below 1370 therefore could usher in some strong selling. If the bulls can muster up another rally I see upside potential to about 1415. It takes a rally above 1425 to turn the price pattern more bullish at this point.
Key Levels for SPX:
SPX chart, 60-min
Yesterday's and today's rallies were both stopped at the downtrend line from May 19th and therefore that makes a good trend line to keep an eye on if we get another bounce up to it tomorrow. Short against today's high, or against that downtrend line (which will be near 1385 tomorrow morning), is the suggested place to be right now. We could see a minor new high above today's and then a turn back down from there (shown in pink) and it takes a rally above 1401 to turn the price pattern more bullish.
Looking at the weekly chart of NDX I noticed a couple of interesting things. First is the parallel up-channel from October 2002:
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, Weekly, arithmetic price scale
This weekly chart is using the arithmetic scale which keeps the trend lines of the up-channel parallel. The mid line of the channel is where NDX has currently stalled. NDX has oscillated around the mid line during its rally and it could do so again but so far this is a bearish chart. It's common for price to bounce off the bottom of its up-channel, find resistance at the mid line and then drop out of the channel.
But bullishly NDX is still solidly within its up-channel and back above its 50-week moving average, something that has consistently led to more rally so I have to respect the bullish potential for the techs. This follows a bounce off its 200-week moving average in March. If the blue chips were looking stronger I'd be more bullish the techs right now but the non-confirmation from the blue chips, similar to what happened in 2000, is a warning shot across the bow of the USS Bullship.
Now when I take this chart and view it with the log price scale it changes rather dramatically:
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, Weekly, logarithmic price scale
First of all, the parallel up-channel is hardly parallel. Adding to the bullish view from the chart above is the fact that NDX has climbed back above its broken uptrend line from October 2002, right where the 50-wma is crossing. If NDX continues to push higher from here it could very well be pointing to new highs above last October's. Very interesting setup here and it has me a lot more cautious about my bearish stance on the stock market. Bears need to see the techs back below the mid-May low of 1943, shown a little more clearly on the daily chart:
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, Daily
NDX had a double bottom near 1943 last month and a double top near 2050 last month. Double your pleasure in a trade that breaks one or the other as those are the key levels and the direction you should trade this index following the break. As with the longer term up-channels, the parallel up-channel from March is still holding but NDX is finding resistance at the mid line of the channel. Interesting times for NDX here.
Key Levels for NDX:
Nasdaq-100 (NDX) chart, 60-min
Even though the May 30 high is only 10 points below the key level on the daily chart at 2051 I think if 2041 breaks then so too will 2051 and therefore use a break above 2041 to position bullishly. The same in reverse--if yesterday's low near 1979 gives way I believe so too will 1943 so play the break below 1979.
Russell-2000 (RUT) chart, Daily
The RUT remains the more confusing index for me at the moment. It seems to be marching to the beat of its own drummer and I'm just not able to follow its beat. It's whipping back and forth and I can't figure out if it's bullish or bearish. If it continues to chop higher, as shown in pink it will be an ending pattern. If it spikes higher then it'll obviously be bullish. If it drops below its uptrend line from April, currently near 730, and especially if it drops below the May 23rd low near 719, it will be bearish. In between is a coin toss and I'd rather key off the other indices for now. Note though that it's been struggling under its 200-dma near 746 which is why I think it will be bullish if it can rally above and hold above that level.
Key Levels for RUT:
BIX banking index, Daily chart
The banking index continues to slide down that slippery slope of hope as those who keep hoping the worst of the banking write-downs is behind us then find out that well, maybe not. The descending wedge pattern suggests lots of choppy price action ahead but it should continue to work its way lower into the summer.
In the "what, are you kidding me?" category is an accounting method adopted by banks that has given them false gains that they've been able to report over the past quarters. Over the past year many banks reported profits based on revaluing their bond debt. They've argued that since they're being forced to revalue their assets (all those abc derivatives on bonds) from mark-to-model to mark-to-market that they should therefore be allowed to revalue the debt on their books. This has been approved as Statement 159 by the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) which makes me wonder who's on that Board? Trouble is there's no control over how they're doing this.
As an example, Merrill (MER) added $4B of revenue to their bottom line for the past three quarters to account for the dropping value in their debt (the bonds that are losing value). So basically the banks can now post substantial gains as a result of the decline in their own creditworthiness. By this line of thinking the bank will be able to claim the highest value when their debt is devalued to zero (huh?).
These additions to the bottom lines of banks have essentially masked $160B in write-downs over the past year. And we wonder why there's a lack of transparency in the banking industry? Until there's clarity with what's happening it remains a game of cat and mouse between bulls and bears in the banking sector. But it all smells pretty fishy to me, the dead kind.
U.S. Home Construction Index chart, DJUSHB, Daily
After breaking below its uptrend line from January the home builders are trying to hold onto the broken downtrend line from February 2007. The pattern has me wondering if we're going to get a small fractal of the pattern that played out from the mid-April low. The price pattern is corrective enough to suggest we could see another rally leg (pink) before tipping back over but I think instead, like the banks, we'll see the home builders work their way lower into the summer.
Transportation Index chart, TRAN, Daily
The Trannies have refused to break down. Between the techs and the transports I have to give the bulls their due. Until both start breaking down I think bears need to pay close attention and be careful here. A break back above the May 19th high near 5537 would be bullish. Watch the uptrend line from March since it should hold if the bulls remain in control. It takes break below the May 23rd low near 5121, with a heads up if it breaks below the trend lines near 5240, to put the bears back in control.
U.S. Dollar chart, Daily
It's a choppy climb but the US dollar bulls are keeping the dollar afloat. MACD is back above zero but if the rally doesn't continue it could end up leaving a nasty bearish divergence against the May 7th high. If the dollar rally continues, watch for resistance near 74.40 where the top of its parallel up-channel from March crosses the mid line of its longer-term down-channel from 2005-2006. A drop back below the May lows just under 72 would suggest a move down to at least 70.
Oil chart, Oil Fund (USO), Daily
Oil is still in an uptrend but it's showing a sign of weakness by breaking its uptrend lines. But it has pulled back to its uptrend line from April 1st and has not yet broken below its May 15th low at 97.69 and therefore has not turned the price pattern bearish. In the meantime there remains the possibility for another rally leg (green) and if we get it I suspect it will be the last.
Oil Index chart, Daily
The oil stocks are on a slightly different path than oil but appear to be leading to the downside now. This is typical (commodity stocks lead commodities) and is a heads up that we may have seen the high for oil itself. The break today below 930 is a bearish sign. It takes a rally back above 978 to negate the bearish signal.
Gold chart, Gold Fund (GLD), Daily
Gold is trying hard to hold onto its uptrend line from August 2007 which is where it found support in mid May, end of May and the last two days. Obviously traders think this uptrend line is important and a break of it will likely hit a lot of stop orders. It takes a break below 85 to turn the price pattern bearish and a rally back above 92 to keep the hopes alive for new highs in gold. As usual, keep an eye on what the dollar is doing.
Economic reports, summary and Key Trading Levels
Tomorrow is very quiet as far as economic reports go, with only the jobless claims on deck. The market will be left to fend for itself and I don't know of anything significant that could move the market tomorrow morning.
The current price action reminds me of distribution as it chops higher and then sells off quickly. That might be my bearish-colored glasses tainting my perspective but that's the way it looks. Internals today were neutral except for the higher number of new 52-week lows vs. new highs. We've got divergence between the techs and small caps looking more bullish vs. the blue chips looking more bearish. This kind of divergence is typically not a healthy sign for the market but it's by no means a timing signal, just a warning.
Another warning is what I see happening with the 10-year yield (TNX). Since the end of the 1990s stock prices have tended to be in synch with yields (so counter to bond prices). Money has rotated from bonds to stocks and back again. I see the potential for yields to tip over here. Back in March 2007 I had shown a weekly chart to show the rising wedge pattern that was developing since the June 2003 low. Based on the EW (Elliott Wave) pattern and the rising wedge I was showing why I thought we'd see a relatively quick decline back to the 2003 low (and below). Here's the chart from March 2007:
10-year Yield (TNX), Weekly, March 2007
I was looking for one more rally leg up to the 5.4% area and then let go to the downside. Here's the updated chart through today's close:
10-year Yield (TNX), Weekly, present
TNX didn't quite make it up to 5.4% (its high was a little over 5.3%) and then yields collapsed from that high in June 2007. Since the January 2008 low we've had an a-b-c bounce for what I believe is a correction of the June-January decline and will be followed by another leg down that easily breaks the January low. TNX has so far failed at its 50-week moving average (the blue moving average). If stocks remain in synch with yields, as I believe they will, this is a bearish omen for the stock market.
It also means the Fed will not be raising rates but instead will be forced to lower rates further as they follow TNX. It also means we'll probably see inflation abate and probably renewed fears of deflation will soon be discussed (if the pattern plays out as I've depicted). Flight to safety in Treasuries, no matter what the return, would be the reason this scenario plays out.
The VIX closed above its 50-dma today, the first time since March, and it poked above its May 27th high. These are buy signals for VIX and therefore sell signals for the stock market. But there's just enough evidence in VIX to suggest bears need to be cautious here as I see the possibility for VIX to drop sharply back down (as the market rallies). This leaves me thinking both sides need to be cautious until we get a little more price action to point the way. Keep an eye on those key levels on the charts and play the break. I think the market is overall bearish but it does not preclude another rally leg above today's high as part of a larger upward correction. Continue to trade the market and not get locked into an opinion about which way it's going to go.
Good luck and I'll be back with you next Thursday.
Key Levels for SPX:
Key Levels for DOW:
Key Levels for NDX:
Peabody Energy - BTU - close: 74.05 change: -3.34 stop: 72.89
BTU was hammered today. The stock lost 4.3% one day after exceeding our target near $80.00. The stock is almost back where we started. The three-day pattern in BTU is bearish and more conservative traders will want to strongly consider an early exit right here. Our more aggressive, second target is the $84.00-85.00 zone.
Picked on June 01 at $ 73.92 /1st target exceeded 79.75
iShares Russ.2000 - IWM - cls: 74.30 chg: 0.46 stop: 71.70
Small cap stocks continue to out perform the large cap rivals in the S&P 500. The IWM rallied toward $75 before trimming its gains. We are not suggesting new positions at this time. Last week we were suggesting more conservative traders take profits in the $74.50-75.00 zone. Right now our target is the $77.50-80.00 zone. FYI: The Point & Figure chart's bullish price target has moved from $87 to $96.
Picked on April 28 at $ 72.55 *triggered
Priceline.com - PCLN - close: 134.83 chg: 2.06 stop: 129.90
PCLN displayed some relative strength with a 1.5% gain. The stock actually hit $136.88 intraday. It certain acts like the stock wants to move higher if only the market would cooperate. Our target is the $139.50-140.00 zone.
Picked on May 27 at $132.75 *triggered
Molson-Coors Brewing - TAP - cls: 58.33 chg: 0.50 stop: 55.95
TAP spiked lower right at the open but traders bought the dip at $56.73. The stock rallied most of the day and hit $59.38 before retreating. The trend is bullish albeit the momentum has slowed. Readers may want to wait for a new relative high before initiating positions. Our target is the $64.00-65.00 range. FYI: The P&F chart is bullish with a $69 target.
Picked on May 23 at $ 58.51 *triggered
Emerging Markets 50 ADR - ADRE - cls: 53.87 chg: -0.82 stop: 56.85
ADRE continued to sink and this ETF lost 1.49% before settling on its 50-dma. If ADRE is going to bounce we would look for one here at the 50-dma and at the 200-dma near $52.50. A failed rally under $56 could be used as a new entry point for puts if you don't feel like chasing it. We are going to aim for the $51.00-50.00 zone. FYI: The P&F chart is still bullish.
Picked on June 03 at $ 54.69
Avalonbay - AVB - close: 100.22 change: 0.33 stop: 102.85
AVB delivered a minor oversold bounce but thus far hasn't broken its short-term trend of lower highs. Another bounce back toward $101.40 (today's high) might be a new entry point for puts. We have two targets. Our short-term target is the 100-dma near $97.54. We'll use the $97.65-97.50 zone as our first target to take some profits. Our second target is the $92.50 zone. The Point & Figure chart is bearish with a $90 target. FYI: We do qualify this as a slightly more aggressive play because the REIT stocks like AVB can be volatile and the option spreads are a little wider than normal. Plus, the most recent data listed short interest at 16% of the 70 million-share float.
Picked on June 01 at $101.20
Electronic Arts - ERTS - close: 48.93 chg: 0.36 stop: 50.25
ERTS is bouncing from the $48 region, again. We might consider buying puts on a failed rally near $50.50 but right now we're waiting for a new relative low. We're suggesting readers use a trigger to buy puts at $47.75. If triggered our target is the February lows in the $44.50-44.00 zone. We do consider this a more aggressive trade because ERTS still has a trendline of support it could bounce from. The P&F chart is still bullish.
Picked on June xx at $ xx.xx <-- see TRIGGER
3M Co. - MMM - close: 76.36 chg: 0.13 stop: 77.01
There is no change from our previous comments on MMM although we do note what appears to be another lower high in the stock's bearish pattern. We are still waiting for MMM to breakdown under support near $75.00. Our suggested trigger to buy puts is at $74.95. If triggered our first target is the $70.25-70.00 zone. Our secondary target is the $66.00-65.00 range. The P&F chart is bearish with a $69 target."
Picked on June xx at $ xx.xx <-- see TRIGGER
(What is a strangle? It's when a trader buys an out-of-the-money (OTM) call and an OTM put on the same stock. The strategy is neutral. You do not care what direction the stock moves as long as the move is big enough to make your investment profitable.)
Amgen Inc. - AMGN - close: 44.50 chg: 0.35 stop: n/a
AMGN continues to inch higher. The stock needs to cross the $45.00 level pretty soon if our June calls are going to have any hope. We are not suggesting new strangle positions at this time. We have suggested a July strangle and a slightly more aggressive June strangle. The options in the July strangle are the July $45 calls (AMQ-GI) and the July $40 puts (AMQ-SH). Our estimated cost for the July strangle was $1.65. We want to sell if either option hits $3.50. The options in the June strangle are the June $45.00 calls (AMQ-FI) and the June $40.00 puts (AMQ-RH). Our estimated cost on the June strangle was $0.56. We want to sell if either option hits $1.10 or more. June options expire in less than three weeks.
Picked on May 22 at $ 42.77
McDonald's - MCD - close: 57.98 chg: 0.42 stop: n/a
MCD served up an oversold bounce with a side of failed rally at its 50-dma. It's a bearish meal. Unless the major averages can move sharply higher we think MCD will continue to slide. We are not suggesting new positions. The options we suggested were the June $62.50 calls (MCD-FZ) and the June $57.50 puts (MCD-RY). Our estimated cost was $1.10. We want to sell if either option hits $1.65 or higher. More aggressive traders may want to raise their target. Keep in mind that June options expire in less than three weeks and will see their premium erode more quickly.
Picked on May 18 at $ 60.53
Tyco Intl. - TYC - close: 44.85 change: -0.04 stop: n/a
TYC did not move much today and it gave us a great entry point to open new strangle positions with the back and forth moves around $45.00. We're suggesting readers open strangle plays in the $44.50-45.50 zone. The closer to $45.00 your entry point the better. Our biggest risk is that TYC just bounces sides in a $5.00 range the next several weeks. The options we suggested were the July $47.50 calls (TYC-GW) and the July $42.50 puts (TYC-SV). Our estimated cost was $1.30. We want to sell if either option hits $1.95 (50% gain).
Picked on June 03 at $ 44.89
Natl. Oilwell Varco - NOV - cls: 81.27 chg: -0.46 stop: 79.95
We are giving up on NOV and suggesting an early exit. Long-term we think NOV will move higher but short-term the momentum has stalled and NOV appears to have produced a bearish double top. Technical indicators are suggesting another pull back too.
Picked on May 28 at $ 83.15 /early exit 81.27
Kohls - KSS - close: 45.24 change: 0.50 stop: 45.65
A buy rating from Merrill Lynch is probably why KSS rallied higher this morning. Shares hit $46.20 and tagged its 50-dma before paring its gains. This move may end up being another bearish entry point or part of a bear flag pattern but we've been stopped out at $45.65. We might consider buying puts again on a drop below $43.50.
Picked on June 01 at $ 44.80 /stopped out 45.65
Last week we were on the watch for the 10 day moving average (Pink Line) of the CBOE Equity Put/Call ratio to cross above the 20 (Blue Line) day moving average. The 10 DMA actually popped above the 20 DMA at the close of last Wednesday (May 28th). A while ago I only used the 10 day moving average as the main signal generator. But I decided to utilize the 20 day moving average as the signal confirmation. Otherwise, we might have been short on 5/19 when the 10 day moving average dipped to 0.615 (for your information, the signal turns bearish near 0.60 and bullish near 0.80). In hindsight that would have been a good short entry. However, that was the signal to become neutral. Why not make the call to go short? Well, confirmation is the key with contrarian indicators. Had we made the long call when the CBOE Equity Put/Call Ratio hit 0.80 on March 5th we would have taken some heat from 1333 to 1256 on the S&P 500.
As of the close today the 10 day moving average is 0.693 while the 20 day moving average is at 0.654. The 20 DMA is beginning to head up as well. The indicator is basically suggesting that we have seen a peak in call (bullish) and/or low in put trading. Picture that at the 10 DMAs low there were, on average, 6.15 puts traded for every 10 calls traded.
The Signal: Last week I wrote If the 10 day MA closes above the 20 day MA the signal will become Negative (Bearish). I prefer to see the 10 DMA change direction and break above the 20 DMA for confirmation. We are now on a Negative (Sell/Short) Bias. What does this signal mean? I am not recommending you go short everything in your account. However, I like to shift the portfolio more negatively by selling calls and/or lightening up short puts. In summary, you can trade the initial changes in direction or tests of peak levels but this and the other indicators are best used to adjust overall portfolio directional exposure. SIGNAL: NEGATIVE BIAS
The CBOE Volatility Index ($VIX)
We got a moving average cross on the CBOE Volatility Index ($VIX) too. It closed 0.41 higher today at 20.24. The $VIX hit a low way down at 15.82 on 5/19. Last week the only notable change was that The mainly notable change occurred today in that the 10 day moving average actually moved higher. Yesterday, the $VIX 10 DMA crossed above the 20 DMA. It had to happen someday. The 10 DMA moved up 0.32 to 18,85 while the 20 day moving average ticked up a little to 18.42 from a low of 18.27. As I pointed out before The signal wont be Negative until the moving average cross to confirm. We are now on a Negative (sell/short) signal.
At times Contrarians like to view the $VIX on its own without moving averages
primarily because of the indicators tendency to represent traders panicking in
real time. However, it is difficult to pick the exact point at which option
traders have either thrown in the towel or entered into trading utopia. For
instance, spikes in the $VIX to around 30 can be long signals. But the market
can continue to decline further therefore causing some serious pain for you new
long position. The
moving averages provide a filter from the occasional erratic
pricing action on the $VIX. Furthermore, 20 was our floor until the price broke
below previous lows. Had we gone short when the $VIX first touched 20 we would
have lost a lot.
The Investors Intelligence Polls
About the Indicator: The peak in Bullish Investor Sentiment usually tops 60% while the peak Bearish Investor Sentiment tops at about 45%. We normally look for bearish triggers when the Bullish % peaks and bullish triggers when the Bearish % peaks. I like to see confirmation after the peaks. But there is usually a lag because this poll comes out once a week.
Todays report from the Investors Intelligence polls reflect newsletter writers snapped back to a more bullish posture from last weeks fairly large decrease. The sentiment indicator reflects that there were increasing newsletter writers that were bullish and a decreasing percentage of bearish newsletter writers. This indicator is a Contrarian Indicator in that it provides bullish signals when the majority of the sample (in this case newsletter writers publishing their bias to attract readers like you and me) are bearish. Bearish or short/sell signals are created when the majority of the sample is bullish. Therefore the smart money measures the sentiment of the masses at peaks and lows of the indicator to take the opposite trade.
The Investors Intelligence polls changed quite a bit in the opposite direction
from last weeks large decline in the percent bullish. The Bullish % polled
increased to 44.8% from 37.9%. The increase, however, did not take the Bullish %
above the 5/21/08 reading of 47.3%. The Bearish % only decreased 1.1% to 31.1%.
The Bearish % didnt break below the 5/21/08 low of 30.8%. In last weeks
newsletter I wrote The signal can reverse quickly with a tick back up on the
Spread and/or the Percent
bullish. The signal is therefore being altered to
NEUTRAL from NEGATIVE and will remain so until the Spread can increase above
16.1%. SIGNAL: NEUTRAL BIAS
Today's Newsletter Notes: Market Wrap by Keene H. Little, The Contrarian by
Robert Ogilvie, and all other plays and content by the Option Investor staff.
Option Investor Inc is neither a registered Investment Advisor nor a Broker/Dealer. Readers are advised that all information is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor is it to be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security. All opinions, analyses and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable and written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. In addition, we do not necessarily update such opinions, analysis or information. Owners, employees and writers may have long or short positions in the securities that are discussed.
Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial advisors with respect to any investment. All information contained in this report and website should be independently verified.
To ensure you continue to receive email from Option Investor please add "firstname.lastname@example.org"
Option Investor Inc