Option Investor
Printer friendly version
Keene Little : 12/3/2006 10:52:09 PM

I was asked for an EW update on CME and GOOG so I thought it would be a good idea to review them in light of what might be happening in the broader market. Not that the direction of either of these companies will tell us what the broader market will do but I wouldn't be surprised if they move together.

Starting with a weekly view of CME I've got an EW count that looks pretty solid and my first reaction when I look at it is that we've got a little higher to go in CME before it tops out. Link

The parallel up-channel from late 2004 tells me there's a good chance wave-(4) ended in August and we've been in wave-(5) since that time. I show a little higher to go for this 5th wave and this daily chart shows a closer view of the move up from August. Link

While the weekly chart shows an upside target at 608.89--based on wave-(5) = wave-(1)--I'm showing a lower upside target on the daily chart which is based on an ascending wedge playing out. The ascending wedge idea is based on each wave inside the 5th wave being a 3-wave move (which is found in triangles). This daily chart suggests a minor pullback here will be followed by another rally to a new high. But here's an alternate daily EW count for the 5th wave up. Link

This daily chart calls the end of wave-(4) in May instead of August and that it's been in an ascending wedge for wave-(5) since that time. This count suggests the last high in November, which did a throw-over above the wedge, finished the rally. We won't know which is playing out until we either get a new high after a pullback or if it drops below the August low (425). The first bearish heads up would be a drop below the uptrend line from August, so below 500.

Moving to GOOG, the weekly chart is not quite as clean looking only because the count that I'm using has wave-4 much larger than wave-2. It doesn't pass the "smell" test but it doesn't violate any EW rules. Link

The one thing I do like about the count is that a triangle 4th wave always points to the final move for the trend. So the leg up from August should be the last leg of the rally from 2004 and for that reason fits as wave-5. The other reason I like it is because wave-5 is bearishly divergent against wave-3, the high in January. This is what you look for to help confirm the EW count. I show on the weekly chart that wave-5 finished and the daily chart here shows a closer view of this 5th wave. Link

While I'm not crazy about the interal wave structure (lacking in some impulsiveness, especially in the 1st wave of 5) but the larger wave structure fits. Once again the 5th wave of 5 is bearishly divergent to the 3rd wave of 5 (the high in October). This EW count says the rally in GOOG is finished. I forget who just upgraded GOOG with a price target of $615 but this count says they will miss the mark by a long shot.

If we get a pullback followed by another move higher then that will answer the question in my mind why the beginning of the rally from the August low looks choppy--it means we have some "unwinding" to do and have at least another small 5th wave up to finish the count. The bearish divergences should continue. It takes a drop below 420 to confirm the top is in.

Keene Little : 12/3/2006 10:14:35 PM

Monday's pivot tables: Link and Link

OI Technical Staff : 12/3/2006 9:59:59 PM

The Market Monitor has been archived. You may view it and any previous days here: Link

Disclaimer: Stocks discussed in the Market Monitor are for educational purposes only and any analysis is not meant to imply a recommendation for or against that stock. The analysts in this forum as on any other website are prohibited by the SEC from giving any specific advice to ANY individual trader. All information posted is for ALL readers and is not meant to be directed to any individual. Our analysts cannot answer any email questions regarding any specific stock. Please do not ask and please do not take offense if requests are denied.

Results posted in the Market Monitor are hypothetical and OIN does not claim that any reader achieved these exact results. Due to the lag time between research, writing, posting, uploading, reading and execution there will be differences between the actual signal given and the fill achieved by the reader. Fills may be better or worse but in most cases they will be different. The writers will make every effort to give advance notice of intended signals and indicate potential price targets. Your individual results may vary depending on your activity level and aggressiveness. This forum is intended as an education service only. Trading involves risk and should not be attempted by anyone not ready to accept this risk. By acting on any signal in this forum you agree and personally accept this risk.

Market Monitor Archives