Daily Newsletter, Saturday, 06/25/2005
HAVING TROUBLE PRINTING?
by OI Staff
The investment press spent the last three days whining about the strong market drop and each commentator seized on one of about six different key reasons they felt the market collapsed. None that I saw really saw the big picture. Or maybe they were seeing too much of the big picture and were not focused on the real culprit. Various reasons given included $60 oil, protectionism, weak economics, rising dollar, CNOOC and Unocal, Greenspan comments, etc. Which do
you think was the real cause of the drop?
Dow Chart - Daily
Nasdaq Chart - Daily
SPX Chart - Daily
The Nasdaq climbed to new five month highs on Thursday at 2106 and just as euphoria was taking hold somebody knocked the ladder over. The plunge was sharp and selling continued steadily into Friday's close. The Dow came within a couple ticks of 10650 again on Wednesday and was doing a very good job of holding over 10600 until the sell programs appeared on Thursday. Did something Greenspan say suddenly cause a million investors to rush to the sidelines?
I think not. Was it the China bashing that jumped to the front page when CNOOC made its offer for Unocal? I doubt it. Surely it was the August contract for oil hitting $60 that greased the market skids. Wrong again Kemosabe. (Tonto's name for the Lone Ranger for those of you born after black and white TV went the way of the dinosaurs) If it was $60 oil then why did the markets reach new highs later in the week after that same $60 level was touched on Monday? So many excuses, so little grasp of
reality. I will try to touch on them all.
First the economic picture is slowing as evidenced by several events of the week. The Durable Goods headline number on Friday soared by +5.5% giving the appearance of good news. Under the hood the internal components told a much different picture. The core capital goods, which are comprised of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft, FELL -2.3% for the month. This is the REAL indicator of production growth not the headline number.
New orders for computers and electronics fell -1.2% after dropping -6% in April. A huge increase in orders for Boeing raised the transportation component +21.2% for the month to provide the headline bounce. If anything this should have been somewhat favorable to the markets as it suggests the Fed could quit hiking rates much quicker than we discussed just last week. I do not believe this was a major factor for the market drop. The drop began a day before this number was announced. Did it add to
the already negative trend? Probably, but not a major factor.
the economic side of the ledger we have to consider the impact of the FedEx warning on Thursday. FDX said that higher fuel costs, slowing shipment rates and aggressive competition had blunted their previously rosy outlook. The stock took nearly a -$10 two day hit and settled at $80 on Friday. The transports took a -150 point hit and closed at two-month lows. The impact of high oil was a factor but the sell off was related more to slowing shipments as a sign the economy was slowing.
over $60, who would have thought? (grin) The oil bears are busting out all over but bearish on production not on prices. Bad news seems to beget more bad news and the comments I have been posting for a year are slowly gaining more credibility in the mainstream media. Hardly a day goes by now without some story critical of future demand or current production. The August crude contract bumped against $60 multiple times this week with the December contract closing at $61.15. Both contracts
posted new closing highs. Boone Pickens face was plastered across all the networks on Friday with predictions of $3 gasoline this year and $100-$120 oil within five years. Nice to have the experts in the field agree with your own predictions. Invested in oil yet?
August Crude Oil Chart - Daily
December Oil Chart - Daily
China's CNOOC bid for Unocal ignited a firestorm of China bashing and calls for the administration to veto the deal on the grounds of national security. Personally I strongly agree. I have mentioned in these pages many times over the last year that I expect the U.S. to be in a shooting war with China over oil within ten years. I strongly suggest we not give them the
oil (Unocal) with which to power their war machine as that shooting war gets closer. China just contracted for 40% of the future production of Canada's Northern Lights oil sands. They also just contracted with Venezuela for delivery of oil to China and agreed to invest billions in Venezuela to secure those rights for decades to come. There are only so many sources for oil in the world and China is rapidly trying to acquire as many as possible to guarantee their own future. On Tuesday night I discussed
the rapid buildup in their armed forces and some of the details that were specifically dangerous to the U.S. Is anyone else connecting the dots here?
While on the topic of China and Unocal have you noticed that UCL has not risen much since the CNOOC bid? CNOOC bid $67 per share compared to $60 offered by Chevron. Many think these bids are out of sight and obscene. "Who really wants to buy an oil company at the top of the market" is what many so-called analysts are saying.
To put things in perspective the CNOOC bid only equates to $11.50 per barrel of proven Unocal reserves. Do the math Chevron could afford to pay a lot more but they don't need to. The lack of a jump in UCL highlights the very strong possibility that the CNOOC bid will not get through the approval process. It also represents some disappointment that the bid was not as high as expected with some estimates over $70.
To put this scenario into perspective requires a divergence from
just the oil conversation. The committee meeting where Greenspan and Snow were grilled on Thursday outlined several major problems with China. The high profile oil play just pushed everyone over the edge. Various officials have been waging verbal war with China over the valuation of their currency for several years to no avail. The suggested 27% tariff on all China's products would be a massive overkill and could cause serious economic problems both in the U.S and around the world. China's leaders
are not stupid and they have a very large weapon at their disposal. They currently hold over $625 billion of U.S. debt with $200 billion in U.S. treasuries. Just a suggestion that they could reevaluate their dollar denominated debt could send strong ripples through our financial markets. While I don't think they would intentionally cost themselves billions by playing that trump card it is entirely possible they could hedge against that event before actually playing the card.
trade wars typically are not won with a single shot there is a very strong possibility that we will see escalation by both sides if it appears the Senate vote in late July will pass. For instance, should the U.S. pass a tariff against China then China would likely return the favor with a tariff against U.S. products. How competitive would Cisco and Dell be against the Chinese cloners with a 27% tariff on our products going into China? China is a huge consumer and they are trying to convert
one billion lower class citizens into middle class consumers. I feel the imposition of a tariff against China would be the first blow that would eventually turn into an economic war. Therefore I don't believe the tariff will ever pass. It is not smart to intentionally aggravate the biggest kid on the block and kicking a sleeping bear is always dangerous. It makes no difference that they have a total disregard for copyright laws and copy/steal everything possible. It makes no difference that
they intentionally manipulate their currency to provide a competitive advantage. The answer to this problem is continued diplomatic pressure as they mature into the dominant power on the planet.
The tariff conversation may have had some negative impact to the market but any real economic impact is still to far away to be seen. If there was any impact it was an emotional knee jerk reaction only. So, if the market did not drop on oil, economics or tariffs then what killed it?
I personally believe it was time for profit taking and that profit taking was accelerated in a large way by the Russell rebalance. I have speculated for several weeks that the markets were long overdue for a pause. The 10650/2100/1220 resistance was rock solid and June was rapidly expiring. That should not have been the reason for the severity of the drop. If anything we should have seen a continued underlying bid as the end of the quarter and end of half window dressing took us into July. The
disappearance of the bid may have been due to oil, economics and tariffs but the selling came directly from the Russell rebalance.
I expected it to appear sooner and we entered a DJX put play two weeks ago in the Leaps Trader section in anticipation of this drop. I believe the bullish markets kept funds from selling on hopes of capturing that last penny of profit before being forced to swap stocks for the rebalance. With the inchworm moving ever closer to a breakout they were
hoping for that last burst of short covering to pad their accounts as resistance broke. What they got instead was a dead stop at resistance with Nasdaq 2100 and S&P 1220 as solid tops. When the breakout over 2100 failed on Thursday morning they pulled the sell trigger and their program trades ruled the rest of the week. Dip buyers were methodically hammered on every bounce and we ended up with the worst drop since April with the Dow losing -2.8% for the week. I believe oil, economics and tariffs
may have captured the headlines and removed the bid but the Russell rebalance was the final culprit.
If I am right we should see a rebound on Monday. Despite a Fed meeting on Tue/Wed we still have the end of quarter window dressing ahead. It is also entirely possible the Fed could blink in their statement given the recent economic weakness and suggest they are nearing an end to the measured pace hikes. This would also stimulate the markets into the Q2 earnings.
downside to Q2 earnings is the falling expectations. Current earnings are only expected to show +10% to +12% growth compared to over +20% in Q1. Warnings have been accelerating and next week should be a prime warning week on the Q2 calendar. I expect most of those warnings to be ignored. Granted a high profile tech warning could do serious damage but I think most investors are already factoring in a slow summer.
While I believe $60 oil was only a minor factor this
week I would expect any move over $60 to create substantially more stress. $60 should be a psychological roadblock and a break higher would confirm the bearish production concerns. We are too far away from the fall demand spike to already be over $60. I was not expecting that until August. A breakout now suggests we could see $75 by October. This is a very serious problem for the transportation sector and for many businesses. Higher fuel costs raise the cost of every product that is made with oil
or shipped to market. Diesel is very close to an all time high and could break that high next week. Overall distillate demand is up +7% year over year for the four weeks ended June 17th. Gasoline demand is up +2.5% despite the huge rise in prices over 2004 and diesel demand is up +6.9% year over year. Valero, a large U.S refiner said this week that output of diesel nationwide should drop about -3% in 2006 due to much stronger regulations about the sulfur content of diesel. Just what the markets
needed to hear. Jet fuel demand is up +31% year over year and up +91% since the same period in 2001. U.S. oil production fell last week to an average of 8.7 mbpd, down -255,000 bbls from the prior week. With gasoline demand expected to increase sharply with the July-4th weekend ahead the inventory levels are expected to drop again. There is nothing positive in the near term outlook that should cause oil prices to fall. This should keep oil prices in the headlines for at least two more weeks and
continue to pressure those stocks/sectors that depend on oil. Michael Economides, Professor of Petroleum Engineering at the Univ of Houston said $70 was the next target. He also said, "oil is not going down and that is the end of that story."
My outlook continues to be for a late summer decline unless we see a strong surge in Q2 earnings that surprises everyone. The May rally gains are at risk and there are plenty of news headlines to provide the pressure as we move into mid
July. Personally I see Monday as a short term buying opportunity as laggards continue to buy Russell stocks to complete the rebalance. The actual weightings were not known until the close of business on Friday. The Nasdaq closing numbers are used for the final weighting calculation. This can produce another round of positioning on Monday and that positioning should have an upward bias. (keyword is should) I would look to buy any bounce for a four to five day trade and keep a tight stop. The next
series of potholes are the Fed announcement on Wednesday and the ISM on Friday. An ISM headline number under 50 could be the last straw for any bounce. The various jobs numbers are out on July-7th/8th and any weakening could apply more speed to any July decline. The Nasdaq retreated to initial support at 2050 and a good launching point if the decline was only Russell related. The next Dow support is in the 10150-10200 range and that suggests the market could open Monday looking at the Nasdaq
for leadership. The SPX could also help with Friday's close on recent support at 1190.
SOX Chart - Daily
Russell Chart - Daily
If you are looking for something specific to trade I would think about
EBAY. Ebay had their 10th annual convention this week and there were numerous positive developments. David Faber on CNBC will have an Ebay special on June-29th similar to the Wal-Mart special they ran almost daily for months. I expect this to provide a positive boost to Ebay stock. The bottom fell out of Ebay this week with nearly a -$4 drop. Most of the drop was in the last two days and was likely Russell related. With large companies going into the Russell-1000 the weightings for all other
stocks changed drastically. Internet stocks like Ebay and Yahoo were hit hard. The July $35 call XBA-GG was trading at 95 cents on Friday when I recommended it in the Market Monitor. EBAY closed at $34.31. I believe now that the rebalance is almost over and the CNBC profile event is scheduled for next week it is very possible we could see a significant bounce. If the short time frame scares you there are many other strikes available.
Until November we want to continue buying oil
stocks on any pull back and holding them until year end. Looking at an oil chart it appears more likely there is more upside given the holiday demand ahead. Buying now rather than waiting for any post holiday dip would also be an option. I sure wish I could get the same $11.50 a bbl price CNOOC is offering for Unocal but I don't have that kind of buying power. One analyst speculated that the loser on the Unocal deal could shift their sights to Marathon (MRO) given their diverse operations and
market cap. Just a parting thought for those that need a little extra incentive to buy oil at this level. Until Tuesday remember to enter passively and be ready to exit aggressively if conditions change.
Most Recent Plays
by OI Staff
New Long Plays
New Short Plays
Lear Corp - LEA - close: 36.37
chg: -0.97 stop: 38.51
Lear Corporation, a Fortune 500 company headquartered in Southfield, Mich., USA, focuses on integrating complete automotive interiors, including seat systems, interior trim and electrical systems. With annual net sales of $17 billion in 2004, Lear is one of the world's largest automotive interior systems suppliers. The company's world-class products are designed, engineered and manufactured by more than 110,000 employees in 34 countries.
(source: company press release)
Why We Like It:
It's been a tough year if you are in the automobile industry and equally tough if you're a supplier like LEA. The stock has been sinking for months but we see what looks like a bear-flag consolidation over the last six weeks or so. The recent market sell-off helped push LEA through the bottom of this bear flag pattern, which should initiate the next leg down. Shareholder confidence is probably pretty low considering
that nine out of the last ten brokerage rating comments were negative. Technically we see a new sell signal in LEA's MACD indicator and its P&F chart is very bearish with a $7.00 target. We're going to target a drop toward the $31-30 range but we do not plan on holding over LEA's late July earnings report.
Picked on June 26 at $36.37
since picked: + 0.00
Earnings Date 07/29/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 1.4 million
Playtex - PYX - close: 10.17 change: -0.29 stop: 10.75
Playtex Products, Inc. is a leading manufacturer and distributor of a diversified portfolio of Feminine Care, Infant Care and Skin care products, including Playtex tampons, Playtex infant feeding products, Diaper Genie, Banana Boat, Wet Ones, Baby Magic, Mr.
Bubble and Playtex gloves. (source: company press release)
Why We Like It:
After months of slowly churning higher it looks like PYX is finally showing some weakness. The stock has been struggling with resistance at the $11.00-11.10 range for the past four weeks. Now the recent market sell-off has pushed PYX below support at the $10.40 level and its simple 50-dma. It is true that PYX's P&F chart is pretty bullish but that doesn't mean PYX can't consolidate some of its eight
months of gains. We think PYX could pull back toward the $9.00 region, which would be a 38.2 percent Fibonacci retracement of its October-May rally. We would initiate positions here at current levels. Some traders might want to look for a failed rally under $10.40 first. Other traders might want to wait for PYX to breakdown under the $10.00 mark first before initiating positions. Our official target will be the $9.10-9.00 range.
Picked on June 26 at $10.17
Change since picked: + 0.00
Earnings Date 08/01/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 466 thousand
Updates On Latest Picks
by OI Staff
Long Play Updates
Amer. Home Mtg Invest. - AHM - cls: 35.32 chg: -0.74 stop: 34.95
It's been pretty ugly in
the market the last two days. Friday's market sell-off pulled AHM through the bottom of its three-week trading range. The breakdown below support near $35.50 could spell bad news for AHM. We do see a late afternoon bounce on Friday after AHM hit its 21-dma and the $35.00 level so we're not quite willing to give up yet on AHM but we're not suggesting new bullish positions either.
Picked on June 19 at $36.34
Change since picked: - 1.02
Earnings Date 07/25/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 445 thousand
CB Rich. Ellis Grp - CBG - close: 42.35 chg: +1.19 stop: 38.49
There's no weakness here. CBG added 2.89 percent on volume almost four times the average to close at a new all-time high on Friday. We remain bullish and continue to target the $44.50-45.00 range.
Picked on June 20 at $41.40
Change since picked: + 0.95
Earnings Date 08/01/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 466 thousand
Caremark - CMX - close: 43.12 chg: -0.34 stop: 42.45
CMX is dangerously close to breaking down under support at the $43.00 level. There is probably additional
support at its 50-dma near $42.56 but that's too close for comfort with our stop loss at $42.45. We are not suggesting new plays here and suggest that more conservative traders exit now to avoid further losses.
Picked on May 09 at $43.30
Change since picked: - 0.18
Earnings Date 05/03/05 (confirmed)
Volume: 2.6 million
Deckers Outdoor - DECK - cls: 24.99 chg: -0.19 stop: 23.75
DECK held up pretty well on Friday considering the market's decline. Shares of DECK are oscillating around round-number support/resistance at the $25.00 level. The stock also has some technical support at its 50-dma near $24.43. We remain bullish on the stock given the breakout three sessions ago but considering the current market environment readers may want to
wait for DECK to push back above the $25.50 level before considering new bullish positions. Our target is the $29.50-30.00 range but we do not plan on holding over DECK's July earnings report.
Picked on June 22 at $25.88
Change since picked: - 0.89
Earnings Date 07/21/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 753 thousand
- XOM - close: 58.15 change: -0.87 stop: 56.99
Crude oil may be climbing but it's not helping shares of XOM lately. The stock lost another 1.47 percent and broke down below its simple 100-dma on Friday. We're not that surprised. We've been suggesting to readers to watch for a dip into the $58.50-58.00 region and that's what we got. XOM's decline may have been partially fueled by news that the company will take a $200 million charge in the
second quarter after the Supreme court ruled against it in a service station litigation case. Yet when you consider that XOM rakes in more than $280 billion a year this $200 million charge doesn't look like much. We are cautious on the stock. If XOM breaks down under the $58.00 level we would probably suggest that more conservative traders exit the stock. We are not suggesting new bullish positions at this time.
Picked on June 09 at $58.44
Change since picked: - 0.29
Earnings Date 07/28/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 20.9 million
M/I Homes Inc - MHO - close: 51.55 chg: -1.25 stop: 50.98
Both MHO and housing sector were hit pretty good on Friday as traders rushed to lock in profits. Both MHO and the DJUSHB index have now produced new MACD sell signals.
Plus, both have broken down through their 10-dma and 21-dma's. Overall the picture doesn't look very healthy here, at least short-term. More conservative traders may want to exit now to avoid or minimize any losses. We're going to keep the play open on the chance that the markets and MHO will produce an oversold bounce on Monday. We're not suggesting new plays at this time.
Picked on June 14 at $50.98
Change since picked: + 0.57
Earnings Date 07/25/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 143 thousand
Sirius Satellite Radio - SIRI - cls: 5.96 chg: +0.08 stop: 5.59
SIRI displayed some relative strength on Friday with a rally up to resistance at $6.10. Unfortunately, SIRI couldn't breakout and began to roll over again late Friday afternoon. We remain optimistic given
Friday's gain but we're not suggesting new bullish plays at this time. Our target remains the $6.50 level. We do not plan on holding past SIRI's July earnings report.
Picked on May 22 at $ 5.65
Change since picked: + 0.31
Earnings Date 07/18/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 40.0 million
- SOHU - close: 22.15 change: -0.62 stop: 21.25
There are no surprises here. We warned readers to look for a dip back toward the simple 10-dma near the $22.00 level and that's what SOHU did on Friday. The test now is whether or not traders will buy the dip. Our more conservative readers may want to tighten their stop to protect a small profit. We are not suggesting new bullish positions at this time. Our target is the $24.00 level. We do not plan on holding
over the July earnings report.
Picked on June 13 at $21.25
Change since picked: + 0.90
Earnings Date 07/28/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 924 thousand
Short Play Updates
Rogers Corp - ROG - close: 40.35 change: -0.80 stop: 43.25 *new*
Shares of ROG continue
to turn lower. The stock lost 1.9 percent on Friday and broke down below its 100-dma. The selling actually hit $39.71 before ROG managed a bounce late Friday afternoon. We warned readers that the $40.00 level was the next obstacle for the bears. We would not be surprised to see an oversold bounce back toward the $41.00 level or better before ROG turned lower again. Our target is the 50-dma, which is currently at $39.11. We are lowering our stop loss to $43.25.
Picked on June 20 at $42.40
Change since picked: - 2.05
Earnings Date 07/18/05 (unconfirmed)
Average Daily Volume: 94 thousand
Closed Long Plays
Closed Short Plays
Today's Newsletter Notes: Market Wrap by Jim Brown and all other
plays and content by the Option Investor staff.
Option Investor Inc is neither a registered Investment Advisor nor a
Broker/Dealer. Readers are advised that all information is issued
solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an
offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor is it to be
construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or
otherwise) any security. All opinions, analyses and information
included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable and
written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind,
expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any
representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness,
correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. In addition, we do not
necessarily update such opinions, analysis or information. Owners,
employees and writers may have long or short positions in the
securities that are discussed.
Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial
advisors with respect to any investment. All information contained in
this report and website should be independently verified.
To ensure you continue to receive email from Option Investor please
Option Investor Inc
PO Box 630350
Littleton, CO 80163
E-Mail Format Newsletter Archives